Embarrassment to Christians

Originally posted by FMF
What does 'the honourable thing to do' for RJHinds have to do with a poster called Zygalski? Why is RJHinds still here?

Yes, I don't know what Zygalski's relevance is but RJ seemed to accept him as judge in this matter and said that he would accept Zygalski's conclusion. Zygalski concluded that RJ had cheated and RJ accepted that, after RJ had previously asserted that he did not cheat. Hence RJ also lied.

--- Penguin

Originally posted by CalJust
I haven't been following your latest posts but, yes, I have been cringing in my heart with embarrassment at many of your utterances.

RJHinds has been asked why he hasn't withdrawn and is still here even after being exposed as a cheat. I wonder what you make of this:

RJHinds: It is by the grace of the Lord Jesus that I am still here as a benefit for some on this forum. Many of you need spiritual help badly. And I have also been given the honor of helping Christ divide the Wheat from the Chaff. [...] [I] think I am still here because the Lord can still use me to help to fulfill His purpose.

Originally posted by FMF
What does 'the honourable thing to do' for RJHinds have to do with a poster called Zygalski? Why is RJHinds still here?

I am still in the process of bundling tares. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am still in the process of bundling tares. 😏

This does not answer the question. Your integrity being in doubt affects your credibility as someone claiming to offer spiritual "insight". I sometimes wonder if you honestly believe you are handling this whole issue in wise or exemplary way.

Originally posted by FMF
This does not answer the question. Your integrity being in doubt affects your credibility as someone claiming to offer spiritual "insight". I sometimes wonder if you honestly believe you are handling this whole issue in wise or exemplary way.

I am like Jonah, who would rather do something else.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am like Jonah, who would rather do something else.

This still does not answer the question.

Originally posted by FMF
This still does not answer the question.

Christ said, "I am the way, the truth , and the life."

Originally posted by RJHinds
Christ said, "I am the way, the truth , and the life."

This is not an answer to the questions "Why did you accept Zygalski's verdict that you were cheating?" and "Having been exposed as a cheat, why are you still here?"

Quoting Christ is just evasion - and a kind of taking-His-name-in-vain that I was not allowed to engage in when I was young.

Originally posted by FMF
This is not an answer to the questions "Why did you accept Zygalski's verdict that you were cheating?" and "Having been exposed as a cheat, why are you still here?"

Quoting Christ is just evasion - and a kind of taking-His-name-in-vain that I was not allowed to engage in when I was young.

I have already answered that question on the other thread. It is probably on
the first or second page.

P.S. It is the 3rd post on the first page of the thread "Why is RJH still here?"

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have already answered that question on the other thread.

Why not stop being so evasive?

[1] "Why did you accept Zygalski's verdict that you were cheating?"

[2] "Having been exposed as a cheat, why are you still here?"

Why not give unequivocal, secular answers or perhaps cut and paste what you claim were the answers given in some other place?

Originally posted by RJHinds
[My answer] is the 3rd post on the first page of the thread "Why is RJH still here?"

Well here that is:

Originally posted by RJHinds
I have left the chess forum. That fulfills my promise.

P.S. It was a different person I promised to leave the site if he wished.
That was Judge Zygalski. He did not make that decision.

And as I thought, it does not address the questions in my post immediately above this one.

Originally posted by FMF
Why not stop being so evasive?

[1] "Why did you accept Zygalski's verdict that you were cheating?"

[2] "Having been exposed as a cheat, why are you still here?"

Why not give unequivocal, secular answers or perhaps cut and paste what you claim were the answers given in some other place?

I have answered both of those questions before. You are just not paying much
attention.

1. I told him I would accept his verdict before he made it based on my belief
that he would be fair and had ne prejudices against me like Proper Knob had.

2. The decision was never made that I should leave the entire site. It was
suggested to me that I just play chess and stop posting when I was posting
on the Chess site about this with Zygalski by someone else. So I agreed to
to stop posting on the Chess Forum and made one last post informing the
Chess Forum of that. This is the only Forum that I am doing any posting now.


Did you notice Dasa is back? Maybe you can harrass him to get your jollies off.

Originally posted by RJHinds
1. I told him I would accept his verdict before he made it based on my belief
that he would be fair and had ne prejudices against me like Proper Knob had.

He said that you were guilty of an "idiotic" degree of engine use, i.e. you had been cheating.

2. The decision was never made that I should leave the entire site.

The decision about the honourable thing to do having been exposed as a cheat is for you, not for Zygalski or anyone else.

So you still have not addressed the question: Having been exposed as a cheat, why are you still here?

Originally posted by FMF
He said that you were guilty of an "idiotic" degree of engine use, i.e. you had been cheating.

[b]2. The decision was never made that I should leave the entire site.

The decision about the honourable thing to do having been exposed as a cheat is for you, not for Zygalski or anyone else.

So you still have not addressed the question: Having been exposed as a cheat, why are you still here?[/b]

The other answer that I did not repeat here was that it is the Lord's will that
I stay here a little longer.

Originally posted by RJHinds
it is the Lord's will that I stay here a little longer.

What then... line on the left one cross each?