Originally posted by Proper Knob
You keep telling yourself that Ron. 'Idiotic engine use' matches your idiotic postings.
Now, if you could, explain how the evaluation process was 'flawed'?
It was someone else that suggested the process must be flawed, I just agreed
with him. Maybe you should review both this and evolution and see where the
flaw is. I do not have access to your evaluation process so how should I know.
But for your information kingshill wrote me a message stating that according
to the evaluation being used practically everyone I was being compared to
must be computer engine users too, including himself. You did notice I was
beaten by several of the people. I did not have all wins and draws. And of
those 20 total of my best games the matchup rate was 65%, which on a
grading scale is a D and in some schools is not considered passing. So unless
this is being graded on the curve system, I don't even see how one could
suggest cheating without throwing in a little bias. Opinion is not science.
P.S. That means opinion is not proof in case you are slow to understand.