2 edits
Originally posted by FMFIf it is was not an attack on his personality, what was it FMF?
As I said before, I disagree with galveston75's and your negative and pessimistic version of the state of the world and the human condition. It has been discussed many a time in detail. You seem to want to dismiss my disagreement as some kind of "attacking his personality" thing. Others might interpret this as you trying to play me rather than play the ball in t ...[text shortened]... scussion. Sorry to repeat myself but you did not really address this when I posted it before.
galveston75 is one of the most pessimistic and negative posters I have encountered on RHP
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFNo I claimed that the discussion may go pear shaped and my fears seem to have been realised.
You claimed that the world was going to go "pear shaped". He has asked you "pear shaped in what way?" How can that be said to be "completely ignoring the actual discussion at hand?"
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf I say "there is plenty of evidence that the human condition is improving and that the world is a better place - when all is weighed up - than it was in the past" it does not mean that I am saying there aren't "any problems" in the world. This is simply an installment of a mere few words typed out and offered in a pessimism v optimism discussion that has been going on for maybe as long as two years in which the progress and problems have been discussed in detail and repeatedly.
you seem to me to make no reference to any problems and only did so once prompted by my timely intervention.
Originally posted by FMFok, fine, perhaps you may make reference to them in the future without being prompted and prior to any disparaging portrayal of another user.
If I say "there is plenty of evidence that the human condition is improving and that the world is a better place - when all is weighed up - than it was in the past" it does not mean that I am saying there aren't "any problems" in the world. This is simply an installment of a mere few words typed out and offered in a pessimism v optimism discussion that has been ...[text shortened]... two years in which the progress and problems have been discussed in detail and repeatedly.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo, it is me expressing disagreement with his pessimistic and negative interpretation of the state of the world and its place on the trajectory of history. He picks and chooses "evidence", ranging from assertions he won't take questions on, to a YouTube video of some kids mistreating an old lady, to lay out this pessimistic and negative prism through which he views the state of mankind. I can simply think of no other poster whose take on the world is as pessimistic and negative as galveston75's. It is not an "attack on his personality" for me to disagree with him in this way.
If it is was not an attack on his personality, what was it FMF?
[b]galveston75 is one of the most pessimistic and negative posters I have encountered on RHP[/b]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI've been making reference to the problems of the world for years and years on this Forum and on the Debates Forum.
ok, fine, perhaps you may make reference to them in the future without being prompted and prior to any disparaging portrayal of another user.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobiewe always win, we know weve only got 90 minutes to get the job done. you guys are always holding on, defending deep, never getting past your own half-way line, hoping that there will be extra-time.
oh deluded one, you can never win, never, while we have Vagner Love in our team.
vagner love? i see stephan kuntz as more your type of player.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobiesin has physical control over matter. it effects things, a bit like entropy. matter over time become corrupted creating negative results. like harmless bacteria becoming human killing std's or the forming of cancer in cells.
the parameters of sin, LOL, I am not sure I understand what you mean? God decided.
is sin free to physically change matter with no limitations? or does sin have limits on its abilities to effect matter?
Originally posted by FMFLOL, whatever you say FMF, it pains me to see a man with his back to the wall.
No, it is me expressing disagreement with his pessimistic and negative interpretation of the state of the world and its place on the trajectory of history. He picks and chooses "evidence", ranging from assertions he won't take questions on, to a YouTube video of some kids mistreating an old lady, to lay out this pessimistic and negative prism through which he vi ...[text shortened]... ton75's. It is not an "attack on his personality" for me to disagree with him in this way.
Originally posted by stellspalfieI really cannot say Palfie, Bible is not so explicit, sorry.
sin has physical control over matter. it effects things, a bit like entropy. matter over time become corrupted creating negative results. like harmless bacteria becoming human killing std's or the forming of cancer in cells.
is sin free to physically change matter with no limitations? or does sin have limits on its abilities to effect matter?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieStop trying to play me rather than the ball, robbie. This is a debate/discussion forum. People disagree. Disagreeing is not "an attack on a posters personality".
LOL, whatever you say FMF, it pains me to see a man with his back to the wall.
