Go back
Evidence please

Evidence please

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @dj2becker
... that post you are supposedly refusing to read refutes your conspiracy theory.
Wow! Does it? Really? It "refutes" my perspective, does it? Well, then that seals it. I'm DEFINITELY not going expose myself to its content. In that case, there's no way in hell I am going to read it now.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Wow! Does it? Really? It "refutes" my perspective, does it? Well, then that seals it. I'm DEFINITELY not going expose myself to its content. In that case, there's no way in hell I am going to read it now.
I think it refutes your 'conspiracy theory' not your 'perspective'. There is a difference you know. That's perfectly fine, be an ostrich and bury your head in the sand. 😉


Originally posted by @dj2becker
I think it refutes your 'conspiracy theory' not your 'perspective'.
So, in your view, I have reason to be scared of it. OK, I accept that that is your view.

Any comment on my relative long, original, not copied from someone else, especially for you, piece of writing about the human condition and religious fervour?


Originally posted by @fmf
So, in your view, I have reason to be scared of it. OK, I accept that that is your view.

Any comment on my relative long, original, not copied from someone else, especially for you, piece of writing about the human condition and religious fervour?
I might respond to your posts in the future if you demonstrate some intellectual integrity. You seem to have lost it. Whenever you are confronted with something you cannot answer you pretend to have answered it in the past. Now you are refusing to read posts. Talking to you seems to be a massive waste of my time. Take care FMF.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
I might respond to your posts in the future if you demonstrate some intellectual integrity. You seem to have lost it. Whenever you are confronted with something you cannot answer you pretend to have answered it in the past. Now you are refusing to read posts. Talking to you seems to be a massive waste of my time. Take care FMF.
This is a development I wholly approve of. You are one of the biggest jerks I have met on this forum in a decade spent interacting with more than a few.

I will continue to reply to things you say when it suits me. Your silence will have whatever meaning other posters choose to ascribe to it, just as they can make what they want of my reaction to your copy paste gimmick earlier. That will be fine by me.

Sorry about what happened to you when you were younger. Truly. I hope you do find your way someday. But if your gimmicks and trolling and seeming intellectual impairment here are who you really who you are, then your cult and your parents really do have a lot to answer for.

You take care too. 😉


Originally posted by @fmf
This is a development I wholly approve of. You are one of the biggest jerks I have met on this forum in a decade spent interacting with more than a few.

I will continue to reply to things you say when it suits me. Your silence will have whatever meaning other posters choose to ascribe to it, just as they can make what they want of my reaction to your copy p ...[text shortened]... e, then your cult and your parents really do have a lot to answer for.

You take care too. 😉
Just get in a few more final insults while you're at it.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
Just get in a few more final insults while you're at it.
It's my honest appraisal of you. I'd never hire you to work for me. And I'd kick you out of my university class ~ I'd say, go away, and grow up, then try again. Honestly. You simply would not belong. Take it as an insult by all means. To be fair I have called you a jerk many times. But I've simply been calling it how I see it.


Originally posted by @dj2becker
One prophecy on its own is probably not compelling enough and could be coincidence, but when you have more than 300 prophecies fulfilled by one man the mountain of evidence is hard to ignore.
Is Psalms 118:22-24 - whodey cited it - one of those 300?

1 edit

Originally posted by @fmf
It's my honest appraisal of you. I'd never hire you to work for me. And I'd kick you out of my university class ~ I'd say, go away, and grow up, then try again. Honestly. You simply would not belong. Take it as an insult by all means. To be fair I have called you a jerk many times. But I've simply been calling it how I see it.
You must work at a Mickey Mouse university if you can kick students out of your class simply become they disagree with you or because you think they are immature. 😉

1 edit

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You must work at a Mickey Mouse university if you can kick students out of your class simply become they disagree with you or because you think they are immature.
I welcome disagreement. That's not my issue with you at all. You'd not survive any course I taught because you absolutely refuse to listen, process, and genuinely respond to anything that you disagree with. That, plus your reliance on gimmicky discourse-killing questions - and the full array of logical fallacies and dodges - you'd not survive the mid-semester examination, nor the continuous assessment element. You'd be not up to it, frankly, and of no benefit to your classmates. A person that treats discourse as an opportunity to troll people in the way you do offers almost no value. You wouldn't be able to hack it.



Originally posted by @divegeester to dj2becker
You’ve even managed to estrange yourself from ghost of a duke who is probably one of the most placid easy going posters here.
I was just about to say something along these lines too. My little string of attributes was that he is one of the most amiable, erudite, even-tempered, and thoughtful posters here.




Originally posted by @fmf
So, in your view, I have reason to be scared of it. OK, I accept that that is your view.

Any comment on my relative long, original, not copied from someone else, especially for you, piece of writing about the human condition and religious fervour?
Yes, did you came up with that conspiracy theory all on your own or do you have some compelling evidence to support it?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.