Spirituality
31 Dec 17
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfI searched the net for your conspiracy theory all I could find as FMF disease. Seems you sucked the whole FMF conspiracy out of your thumb.
Thats right, I am not going to offer you anything. You're the copy paster. I'm not. See what you come up with. Try to get "objective opinions" if that works better for you.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @divegeesterI have and you simply ignored it, go back and read it again.
Nor do you 😵
Originally posted by @dj2beckerTime for another sock-puppet huh, Fetchmybecker.
I have and you simply ignored it, go back and read it again.
Originally posted by @dj2becker"FMF disease"? Then so be it.
I searched the net for your conspiracy theory all I could find as FMF disease. Seems you sucked the whole FMF conspiracy out of your thumb.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @divegeesterThere's loads of evidence out there. Loads of it.
Nor do you 😵
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhen you asked me what I would say about Divegeester’s stance that the Bible cannot be regarded as evidence, I answered the question head-on a few minutes later. What is your take on my answer?
There's loads of evidence out there. Loads of it.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou have yet to define evidence, you simply reject evidence without giving any kind of indication as to why it does not qualify as evidence.
Try to focus gents and stop attributing devil worship (or something similar) to me just because I'm arguing over the nature of actual evidence. Consider this good teaching from the divegeester - how not to post crappy evidence of the existence of god and avoid getting slaughtered by atheists.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI’m not interested in what’s “out there”, I’m not interested in your copy pastes of other people’s ideas, I’m not interested in links to your habitual websites. All this thread is about is a response to you and sonship as I said in the OP.
There's loads of evidence out there. Loads of it.
YOU claimed that the bible is evidence of God’s existence, I say it isn’t and asked you to provide the rational of why you think it is evidence. You have provided nothing whatsoever, just pages of posts ducking dodging, trying to turn the onus back on to me etc.
Either provide your rational or admit that you don’t have one.
07 Jan 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNo I don’t. YOU have claimed that you have evidence.
You have yet to define evidence, you simply reject evidence without giving any kind of indication as to why it does not qualify as evidence.
What is it?
Originally posted by @jacob-vervilleThis is my position also.
By the nature of the claim, there isn't really going to be a lot of evidence. We are dealing with something that is supposed to precede existence and also is *outside of conventional existence.*
If we think about it lamely by demanding evidence, we will never really be satisfied.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @divegeesterAs far as I can tell:
I’m not interested in what’s “out there”, I’m not interested in your copy pastes of other people’s ideas, I’m not interested in links to your habitual websites. All this thread is about is a response to you and sonship as I said in the OP.
YOU claimed that the bible is evidence of God’s existence, I say it isn’t and asked you to provide the rational ...[text shortened]... rn the onus back on to me etc.
Either provide your rational or admit that you don’t have one.
1.You believe God exists.
2. You believe the Bible is His word to us.
3. It would follow logically that you believe the Bible is a sign or an indication of His existence. Yet it boggles the mind that you somehow believe the Bible is not a sign or an indication of His existence. So that means you either don’t believe either 1 or 2 or both.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI’m not interested in you, your boggled mind nor your time wasting trolling. You are a vacuous time-wasting dick and I’ve asked you not to respond to my posts.
As far as I can tell:
1.You believe God exists.
2. You believe the Bible is His word to us.
3. It would follow logically that you believe the Bible is a sign or an indication of His existence. Yet it boggles the mind that you somehow believe the Bible is not a sign or an indication of His existence. So that means you either don’t believe either 1 or 2 or both.