Originally posted by @romans1009I am not interested.
Only because you haven’t answered the question, and it’s easier to ask you than figure out how to start a thread
Originally posted by @romans1009Well, if you don't like my posts, I suggest you just ignore me.
it’s a pity you can’t discuss this subject civilly and without cheap insults.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou seem to be making a farewell speech with this 'parting shot' style post, and yet a quick look at your last month of posts shows that over 60% of your posts were addressed to me, and over 20% were addressed to divegeester.
I might respond to your posts in the future if you demonstrate some intellectual integrity. You seem to have lost it. Whenever you are confronted with something you cannot answer you pretend to have answered it in the past. Now you are refusing to read posts. Talking to you seems to be a massive waste of my time. Take care FMF.?
Now, we have both called you out for your behaviour - I called you a jerk and a troll, repeatedly, and divegeester called you a dick, a few times ~ accusations which you have rejected ~ and you have dismissed us both, at various times, as a 'waste of your time'.
And yet maybe as many as 85% of your posts in the last month or so have been addressed to just TWO posters on this forum: me and him.
Rather strange don't you think?
Originally posted by @romans1009Well, in our conversation today, in this first forum discussion you have supposedly ever had on this web site, and in the only set of circumstances in which you might purport to know me and the way I post, I have indeed said to you a few times that, if you're genuinely interested in what the contributors to this thread think about its subject, you should just go and read it instead of expect them to repeat themselves for your benefit. Is that what you are alluding to?
Don’t know this Becker dude, but he’s spot on with this sentence: Whenever you are confronted with something you cannot answer you pretend to have answered it in the past.
Originally posted by @fmfNo, I’m referring to your claim that you already answered questions I had asked you and your implication that I search through 35 pages of posts to find your nuggets of wisdom.
Well, in our conversation today, in this first forum discussion you have supposedly ever had on this web site, and in the only set of circumstances in which you might purport to know me and the way I post, I have indeed said to you a few times that, if you're genuinely interested in what the contributors to this thread think about its subject, you should just g ...[text shortened]... instead of expect them to repeat themselves for your benefit. Is that what you are alluding to?
Obviously I knew you hadn’t previously answered the questions I asked, and I didn’t waste my time looking for something that didn’t exist
Originally posted by @romans1009Obviously I knew you hadn’t previously answered the questions I asked, and I didn’t waste my time looking for something that didn’t exist
No, I’m referring to your claim that you already answered questions I had asked you and your implication that I search through 35 pages of posts to find your nuggets of wisdom.
Obviously I knew you hadn’t previously answered the questions I asked, and I didn’t waste my time looking for something that didn’t exist
Really?
Originally posted by @romans1009Atheists don't believe God exists.
Never said it was a Christian site.
But I’m not that interested in hearing why “atheists” spend so much time debating whether God exists. It’s pretty clear to me, based on numerous past conversations with self-professed atheists, that they really either hate God, or, like you, are terrified of Him.
Please explain Becker (I mean Romans1009) why would an atheist hate or fear something they don't believe in. Does that sound rational to you? - I suspect, in the numerous conversations you have had with atheists, you simply haven't been listening to what they're saying.
I at least hoped your new incarnation would be a little smarter.
Originally posted by @romans1009Only 6 or so hours on this forum, and you already feel some affinity for dj2becker. That's interesting.
Don’t know this Becker dude, but he’s spot on with this sentence:....
Yes, really. Very few, if any, atheists consider the point I raised about early Christians being willing to be persecuted, tortured and executed for refusing to deny something they claim to have seen with their own eyes (as opposed to something they could be honestly mistaken about.) The “why die for a lie?” question is one atheists never seem to consider, and, when they do, they have no coherent answer (as you simply demonstrated.)