Originally posted by Proper KnobAnd yet it has also resulted in tens of thousands of deaths so in yheir instance your argument is absolutely fallacious, is it not?
I just did. The practice of injecting blood intravenously saves lives, why would God wish to ban a practice which saves lives?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBlood transfusions have resulted in many many millions of lives saved. You have stated that you do not dispute the efficacy of blood transfusions.
And yet it has also resulted in tens of thousands of deaths so in yheir instance your argument is absolutely fallacious, is it not?
Originally posted by FMFNo you dont you said they are based on a single verse tht shows you have not the least understanding.
I do understand the principles you espouse after that big set piece thread about this a couple of years ago in which you and galveston75 totally had the chance to lay them out and explain them.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's not fallacious. Sure, contaminated blood has resulted in people dying, but that was nearly 40 years ago. Every medical procedure carries a risk, not just blood transfusions.
And yet it has also resulted in tens of thousands of deaths so in yheir instance your argument is absolutely fallacious, is it not?
Ingesting blood, in anything bar minute quantities, is toxic. Blood transfusions, have done and will continue to save countless peoples lives every year worldwide.
Originally posted by FMFAnd yet in the case of these tens of thousands they resulted in death making the assertion in their case that they save lives fallacious in fact it resulted in their death.
Blood transfusions have resulted in many many millions of lives saved. You have stated that you do not dispute the efficacy of blood transfusions.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou deny that blood transfusions save lives and have in fact saved many millions of lives?
And yet in the case of these tens of thousands they resulted in death making the assertion in their case that they save lives fallacious in fact it resulted in their death.
Is this another one of your main arguments?
Originally posted by Proper KnobIt has resulted in twns of thousands of people dying possibly hundreds of thousands so yoyr argiment that it saves lives in their case fallacious. In fact it resulted not in saving their life but their death. I would amend my assertion if I were you.
It's not fallacious. Sure, contaminated blood has resulted in people dying, but that was nearly 40 years ago.
Ingesting blood, in anything bar minute quantities, is toxic. Blood transfusions, have done and will continue to save countless peoples lives every year worldwide.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre you denying that blood transfusions saves lives?
It has resulted in twns of thousands of people dying possibly hundreds of thousands so yoyr argiment that it saves lives in their case fallacious. In fact it resulted not in saving their life but their death. I would amend my assertion if I were you.
Can you substantiate your hundreds of thousands claim?
Originally posted by FMFI have not denied it at all and your dishonest portrayal that I have is typical of your well dishonest debating techniques. Is it really the best that you can hope for making up lies about people. Wow.
You deny that blood transfusions save lives and have in fact saved many millions of lives?
Is this another one of your main arguments?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's a question: You deny that blood transfusions save lives and have in fact saved many millions of lives?
I have not denied it at all and your dishonest portrayal that I have is typical of your well dishonest debating techniques. Is it really the best that you can hope for making up lies about people. Wow.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHere we go -
It has resulted in twns of thousands of people dying possibly hundreds of thousands so yoyr argiment that it saves lives in their case fallacious. In fact it resulted not in saving their life but their death. I would amend my assertion if I were you.
The practice of injecting blood intravenously saves lives (when proper procedures are followed), why would God wish to ban a practice which saves lives?