Favourite crazies

Originally posted by FMF
Blood transfusions have resulted in many many millions of lives saved. Do you agree or disagree?

There is no doubt that some peoples lives have been saved by administering intravenous blood transfusions.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
There is no doubt that some peoples lives have been saved by administering intravenous blood transfusions.

Would you say many many millions of people saved over recent decades?

Originally posted by FMF
Would you say many many millions of people saved over recent decades?

Do your own research I have no idea how many have bern saved.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Do your own research I have no idea how many have bern saved.

So that's a refusal to answer the point blank question: "Would you say many many millions of people saved over recent decades?"

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Here we go -

The practice of injecting blood intravenously saves lives (when proper procedures are followed), why would God wish to ban a practice which saves lives?

Because its use is sacrosanct.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Because its use is sacrosanct.

So God would rather people suffer and die? Top bloke.

Originally posted by FMF
So that's a refusal to answer the point blank question: "Would you say many many millions of people saved over recent decades?"

I have stated I have no idea and if you want to know I suggest that you do your own research. Then again facts never really were your remit.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
So God would rather people suffer and die? Top bloke.

You mean like in the case of those people who died as a direct result of blood transfusion I am sure god would rather they did not suffer. Maybe your argument that blood saves lives woukd also comfort their grieving families.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
And yet you cannot bring yourself to address the point if it is forbidden to eat why it then becomes permissable to inject it intravenously.

Back to this point.

Ingesting blood is toxic, that is why you should not do it. Intravenously inject blood saves lives (when correct procedures are followed). That is why one course of action is permissible and the other forbidden.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have stated I have no idea and if you want to know I suggest that you do your own research. Then again facts never really were your remit.

You said "[blood transfusions have] resulted in tens of thousands of people dying possibly hundreds of thousands". Would that be more than or less than the number of lives saved in your estimation?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You mean like in the case of those people who died as a direct result of blood transfusion I am sure god would rather they did not suffer. Maybe your argument that blood saves lives woukd also comfort their grieving families.

People die from all manner of medical procedures, none, I'll repeat that NONE are 100% safe.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Because its use is sacrosanct.

why?


.....and you never told me if you would suck poison from a snake bite on your childs leg if it was required to save their life.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Back to this point.

Ingesting blood is toxic, that is why you should not do it. Intravenously inject blood saves lives (when correct procedures are followed). That is why one course of action is permissible and the other forbidden.

And yet you cannot guarantee its safety.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
People die from all manner of medical procedures, none, I'll repeat that NONE are 100% safe.

Well gee how comforting.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
And yet you cannot guarantee its safety.

Is this another one of your main arguments?