@fmf said
The US Supreme Court has ruled that businesspeople have a first amendment right to refuse to provide services to gay people.
Is this, as some claim, a victory for religious liberty?
Or has this ruling, as others claim, legitimized a poison in US society?
A person, as an owner of a private business, because it is their personal and private property, has the right to discriminate against anyone that seeks services that violate their personal convictions.
Government intrusion into that right is unconstitutional.
Let the society regulate itself. Overseers be damned.
The ruling by the Supreme Court isn't just a win for "religious liberty", but a victory for personal freedom everywhere against anyone seeking to impinge upon the personal and private convictions of another.
"Gay people" have no greater rights that override the rights of others, and the government has no jurisdiction in the affairs of law abiding private citizens in the administration of their businesses, or private lives, in a free society.
For a government to enforce laws that require private businesses or any other private and separate institution or peoples to acquiesce to the demands of a specific people group that practice a lifestyle that offends their moral convictions is tyranny.
It's as if people can't comprehend what constitutional liberty even means!