323d
@divegeester saidIt's not for me to decide.
I read your earlier reply but it didn’t answer my question, which about what you believe to be right.
Do you personally think it is right for a doctor to let someone die because that person’s sexual lifestyle offends their religious sensibilities?
But as I understand the Hippocratic oath, which is negligible, the answer is no.
Can you provide an example of where a doctor refused medical care to save a life, and that person died?
I know that tens of thousands of Jehovah's witnesses that have refused a blood transfusion have died, thanks to those clowns in Brooklyn, NY for their deception, but I am unaware of any medical professional refusing medical treatment, although there are many malpractice suits.
So now that you have your answer, and hopefully you do, in what possible way will you now obfuscate the issue and deride my reply and criticize?
@josephw saidWhy do you so often resort to this furtive playing-of-the-man riff rather than the ball?
Fair question.
The answer is relative to the context in which the verses in question occur.
To create a conflict between seemingly opposing truth belies the truth of each, and demonstrates the exegetical ignorance of anyone that attempts to do so.
Trust me, there's absolutely no way you're going to understand what the scriptures teach while being an agnostic-atheist.
All you can do is debate and argue without understanding.
323d
@josephw
So it would seem you are unable to answer the question of whether the scripture about believers not being "unequally yoked together with unbelievers" supersedes "love your neighbour and love your enemies and judge others not lest you be judged". Perhaps it is too difficult or awkward a question?
323d
@fmf saidToo difficult a question for you.
@josephw
So it would seem you are unable to answer the question of whether the scripture about believers not being "unequally yoked together with unbelievers" supersedes "love your neighbour and love your enemies and judge others not lest you be judged". Perhaps it is too difficult or awkward a question?
I answered the question, but I doubt you read it, and even if you did the spiritual application went over your head.
According to the scriptures you are spiritually dead and have not the capacity to understand them because you don't have the Spirit of God, but according to the scriptures you have the spirit of this world which denies God's Christ.
Call it what you will, but that's what the scriptures teach, and that you cannot deny.
323d
2 edits
@fmf saidAnd you obviously have an insecurity complex based on the fact that you'll say anything to prop up your assertions to keep from losing face.
Your ersatz pomposity and word salads make you sound like you have an inferiority complex.
Your angry face avatar proves it. 😡
Ersatz pomposity indeed, hypocrite. It's you that's the word salad man around here. Straight talk flies in you face, so you resort to ad hominem.
323d
@josephw saidNone of this playing-the ball-stuff prevents you from answering the question about your belief.
According to the scriptures you are spiritually dead and have not the capacity to understand them because you don't have the Spirit of God, but according to the scriptures you have the spirit of this world which denies God's Christ.
323d
@josephw saidWhy do you resort to this kind of thing every single time? I have simply asked you if you believe 2 Corinthians 6:14 supersedes, according to your beliefs, the exhortations in scripture to Christians to love their neighbours, love their enemies, and judge others not lest they be judged.
And you obviously have an insecurity complex based on the fact that you'll say anything to prop up your assertions to keep from losing face.
Your angry face avatar proves it. 😡
Ersatz pomposity indeed, hypocrite. It's you that's the word salad man around here. Straight talk flies in you face, so you resort to ad hominem.
322d
@divegeester saidHas she ever claimed Republicans shouldn't be allowed to marry, adopt children or that it should be legal to deny them public services?
Whilst I agree with your principle about this, don’t you yourself discriminate against Republicans by claiming a Republican cannot be a real Christian?
No. Learn the difference between denying rights and holding an opinion.
@josephw saidGood grief, where to start.
Too difficult a question for you.
I answered the question, but I doubt you read it, and even if you did the spiritual application went over your head.
According to the scriptures you are spiritually dead and have not the capacity to understand them because you don't have the Spirit of God, but according to the scriptures you have the spirit of this world which denies Go ...[text shortened]... 's Christ.
Call it what you will, but that's what the scriptures teach, and that you cannot deny.
And what a revelation your post is about your religious and social bigotry
@vivify saidSuzianne has openly stated that a Republican cannot be a true Christian.
Has she ever claimed Republicans shouldn't be allowed to marry, adopt children or that it should be legal to deny them public services?
No. Learn the difference between denying rights and holding an opinion.
I didn’t say anything about rights, adoption, services… I’m pointing out that Suzianne discriminates against Republicans who claim to be Christian, based on her political beliefs. I’m pointing out to her that in doing so while attacking other people for discrimination, that she is being hypocritical.
Learn to follow the exchanges.
@josephw saidBut I’m not asking you to “decide” wether or not a person receives medical care or not; I’m asking you what you believe, I’m questioning your moral compass. Here’s the question again, fourth time…
It's not for me to decide.
Do you personally think it is right for a doctor to let someone die because that person’s sexual lifestyle offends their religious sensibilities?