Originally posted by galveston75
Do you really not understand what that law was for?
i could ask you the same question. the sharia law requires a thief to have his arm cut off. "do you not understand what that law is for"? is the question in the quotation marks relevant? does it justify the law? or is the law still barbaric? of course it has a reason behind it: an armless thief cannot steal so much, there is only so much you could grab with your teeth.
i am not judging the jews for this law. just as i don't judge the nowadays germans for the nazis. or the mongolians for genghis khan. i am just supporting the idea that the bible is not timeless and immovable. not entirely.
fruthermore, the arm cutting law from the sharia is actual even more logical than the "proof of virginity" law. it accomplishes something as a deterrent. as rendering thieves armless and unable to steal.
but the proof of virginity? let's go back through it again: any man can accuse his wife of not having been a virgin. how he can tell is very accurate: the jews had incredible technology. so he accuses his wife. the wives parents(wtf?) are required to offer proof of innocence, not the accuser as it is normal. but what proof can they offer? the bed cover from the marital bed? that can be bled upon easily. but what about girls with elastic himens who upon having sex for the first time don't offer any signs?
so alas, the girl fails to show any proof of virginity and she gets bludgeoned by big freakin rocks. bear in mind how young the girls married then so it's basically a 14 year old girl getting killed in a gruesome fashion.
what does the man get if he falsely accuses? a freakin fine😀
it is good to be a jew man in the old testament.
like i said, if you support the 100% accurate and awesome bible i only need 1 example to prove you wrong. and i think i just did. sure i probably delude myself you would read this.