1 edit
@KellyJay
A youtube link with no clue or summary, what's it's about? C'mon Kelly, you can do better than that.
But I will tell you this, whatever 'magic' your commentator thinks he sees in numbers, it's all in his own mind. Just like Kepler--who thought he'd proven why there could be only seven planets in the solar system, because there are exactly seven platonic solids. Correct math--rubbish cosmology.
@moonbus said50+73-12x146= God.
@KellyJay
A youtube link with no clue or summary, what's it's about? C'mon Kelly, you can do better than that.
But I will tell you this, whatever 'magic' your commentator thinks he sees in numbers, it's all in his own mind. Just like Kepler--who thought he'd proven why there could be only seven planets in the solar system, because there are exactly seven platonic solids. Correct math--rubbish cosmology.
@moonbus saidDon't bother answering anything I write. I no longer care what your opinions are of what I write or post, as you make up what I say and twist it to something you want it to mean. Then run off and tell others what I meant when you have no stinking idea.
@KellyJay
A youtube link with no clue or summary, what's it's about? C'mon Kelly, you can do better than that.
But I will tell you this, whatever 'magic' your commentator thinks he sees in numbers, it's all in his own mind. Just like Kepler--who thought he'd proven why there could be only seven planets in the solar system, because there are exactly seven platonic solids. Correct math--rubbish cosmology.
@KellyJay saidThat's nonsense Kelly and you actually stand guilty of what you accuse him of, frequently misrepresenting what I believe, despite being corrected many times.
Don't bother answering anything I write. I no longer care what your opinions are of what I write or post, as you make up what I say and twist it to something you want it to mean. Then run off and tell others what I meant when you have no stinking idea.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidI stick around and HOPE you come back and show me where I wronged you, but you ALWAYS run off, get in a cheap shot, and leave. That is not the same thing he did to me.
That's nonsense Kelly and you actually stand guilty of what you accuse him of, frequently misrepresenting what I believe, despite being corrected many times.
@fourfivesix saidActually, the link disagrees with your last.
@KellyJay
Math is proveable, God isn't. Axioms (assumtions) about God don't lead to generally accepted statements. The guys deceiving himself!
@KellyJay saidNonsense. I'll tell you one more time:
I stick around and HOPE you come back and show me where I wronged you, but you ALWAYS run off, get in a cheap shot, and leave. That is not the same thing he did to me.
I do not believe something came from nothing. I believe in an eternal universe.
Two months from now you will misrepresent what I believe as though you have never been told this.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidEternal regress, you really do need to watch that link you do not have anything you can point to that supports that.
Nonsense. I'll tell you one more time:
I do not believe something came from nothing. I believe in an eternal universe.
Two months from now you will misrepresent what I believe as though you have never been told this.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidYes, but not the God of Abraham.
50+73-12x146= God.
It might as well be Quetzlquatl or the Flying Spaghetti Monster !
😆
@KellyJay saidYou missed the point entirely. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'm talking about you not listening to what I tell you and repeatedly misrepresenting what I believe.
Eternal regress, you really do need to watch that link you do not have anything you can point to that supports that.
I'm telling you as directly as I can that I do NOT believe in a first cause and that the universe has always existed in one form or another. Please add that to your memory bank and do not throw a comment at me in a few months time that 'something can't come from nothing' as though that is something I believe and that you have somehow won the argument.
Please confirm you understand this? - Repeatedly misrepresenting what I believe is irritating and the primary reason I've avoided you in this forum.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidYou do not have evidence to back up your beliefs. I can not argue against some thing with no reasons, you actually require some casual reason for your beliefs that you can point to, to back up the claims!
You missed the point entirely. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'm talking about you not listening to what I tell you and repeatedly misrepresenting what I believe.
I'm telling you as directly as I can that I do NOT believe in a first cause and that the universe has always existed in one form or another. Please add that to your memory bank and do not thr ...[text shortened]... misrepresenting what I believe is irritating and the primary reason I've avoided you in this forum.
Saying a process is repeating eternally isn’t evidence it repeats, that is just you saying it does.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidStop replying to if you think I am not being honest with you.
You missed the point entirely. I don't care if you agree with me or not. I'm talking about you not listening to what I tell you and repeatedly misrepresenting what I believe.
I'm telling you as directly as I can that I do NOT believe in a first cause and that the universe has always existed in one form or another. Please add that to your memory bank and do not thr ...[text shortened]... misrepresenting what I believe is irritating and the primary reason I've avoided you in this forum.