1. Standard memberOmnislash
    Digital Blasphemy
    Omnipresent
    Joined
    16 Feb '03
    Moves
    21533
    08 Dec '05 07:342 edits
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    What a surprise; another "Christian" who thinks that RB shouldn't be "ganged up" on just because he espouses sentiments that are more in line with the KKK than any "Christian" church I ever heard about. You guys are certainly tolerant of racism, sexism and other extreme forms of bigotry. Kudos to you!
    His statement clearly expresses that he is in disagreement with much of what is said. Furthermore, he plainly states that much of RB's statements understandably antagonize his critics.

    There is a significant and critical difference between agreeing with, or advocating for, a postion and simply being tolerant of the individuals expression of their views.

    He is simplisticly expressing his tolerance of others views, and a disagreement with the verbose and inflammatory criticism RB's comments frequently draw. I am of firm agreement with his stance. The rational and civil person will respectfully permit the views of others and exhibit a modicum of entertaining their positions. This is only rational. To the converse, retort based upon generalization and thick with inflammatory remarks, are the hallmarks of the irrational, comparable to the proverbial caveman beating his chest.

    Best Regards,

    Omnislash
  2. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Dec '05 10:231 edit
    Originally posted by Omnislash
    His statement clearly expresses that he is in disagreement with much of what is said. Furthermore, he plainly states that much of RB's statements understandably antagonize his critics.

    There is a significant and critical difference between agreeing with, or advocating for, a postion and simply being tolerant of the individuals expression of their view ...[text shortened]... rational, comparable to the proverbial caveman beating his chest.

    Best Regards,

    Omnislash
    Of course; it is of the utmost importance to listen quietly and respectfully when someone is calling people "niggers", saying they dislike women who are, of course, intellectually inferior to men, describing someone else's church as "The Great Whore" etc. etc. etc.. I admit I should be more tolerant of these views. After all, I wouldn't want to make "inflammatory, irrational remarks".
  3. Standard memberOmnislash
    Digital Blasphemy
    Omnipresent
    Joined
    16 Feb '03
    Moves
    21533
    08 Dec '05 10:581 edit
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Of course; it is of the utmost importance to listen quietly and respectfully when someone is calling people "niggers", saying they dislike women who are, of course, intellectually inferior to men, describing someone else's church as "The Great Whore" etc. etc. etc.. I admit I should be more tolerant of these views. After all, I wouldn't want to make "inflammatory, irrational remarks".
    Way to go caveman. 😉
  4. Donationkirksey957
    Outkast
    With White Women
    Joined
    31 Jul '01
    Moves
    91452
    08 Dec '05 12:38
    Originally posted by kirksey957
    I have sent a message to skeeter to see if she will play RBHill ten clan games, one on one against him. To me this is reminiscent of the ancient Old Testament challenge where the god's of Baal met their match against the one true faith. As I believe it was Elisha who even had the wood soaked in water, I believe that maybe skeeter may indulge you with R2-R3 as her first move. The gauntlet is thrown down.
    RB, she has agreed to play you two games and as an added feature, she will play black in both games to help you demonize her more.
  5. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Dec '05 14:27

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Dec '05 16:55
    Originally posted by dottewell
    Interesting that so many people's paragon of a "fundamentalist" Muslim is either someone from the Taliban or a group like Al Qaeda. So many scholars think their ideologies are NOT based on a proper (or even literal) interpretation of Islamic texts, in toto.

    Does something similar apply with Christianity?
    Ever hear of David Koresh? Or Jim Jones?
  7. Jupiter
    Joined
    18 Nov '05
    Moves
    183
    08 Dec '05 16:57
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Ever hear of David Koresh? Or Jim Jones?
    or george bush ?
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Dec '05 16:58
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    [b]Sonhouse: "They all have one thing in common: Extreme pressure on people to convert."

    So, this would be a criterion in your definition in order to establish whether someone is a fundamentalist or not ? Correct ?[/b]
    One of the definitions. Course, I can hear your response:
    I never put pressure on people to convert.....
  9. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Dec '05 17:01

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Dec '05 17:421 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  11. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    08 Dec '05 18:17
    Originally posted by sasquatch672
    Omni, gotta tell ya bro, I think you're backing the worng horse here. RBHILL is STANG's half-brother (hmmm...they both capitalize their names...co-inkydink?) and espouses the opposite ideals as Stang, but they're both callous, angry, judgmental, bigoted, racist attention whores.

    Get on the right side of this one.
    If Hitler was posting in this forum and I blasted him, the same people would come to his defense from my "bullying" tactics. It's not what's being said; it's who's saying it. It also helps RB that he wraps his bigotry in a religious cloak, so that these people think he's some kind of kindred soul.
  12. Felicific Forest
    Joined
    15 Dec '02
    Moves
    48732
    08 Dec '05 20:41
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    If Hitler was posting in this forum and I blasted him, the same people would come to his defense from my "bullying" tactics. It's not what's being said; it's who's saying it. It also helps RB that he wraps his bigotry in a religious cloak, so that these people think he's some kind of kindred soul.
    If Hitler was posting on this site, he would be on your side .... insulting and bullying people.
  13. Standard membersasquatch672
    Don't Like It Leave
    Walking the earth.
    Joined
    13 Oct '04
    Moves
    50664
    08 Dec '05 20:48

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  14. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    08 Dec '05 21:16
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    You're pathetic. If Hitler had only been more polite he would have been Okey-dokey according to your "logic".
    The Pope was cool wid hitler, wasn't he?
  15. Standard memberfrogstomp
    Bruno's Ghost
    In a hot place
    Joined
    11 Sep '04
    Moves
    7707
    08 Dec '05 21:20
    Originally posted by ivanhoe
    If Hitler was posting on this site, he would be on your side .... insulting and bullying people.
    Why would Hitler , who was the popes guy, side with an agnostic?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree