But of course, I wasn't addressing you. I was addressing C3. Based on C3's OP, a primer was necessary for HIM. Not everything is about you jaywill though given your self-centered and self-serving system of beliefs, it makes sense that you might think so.
"If" means it was not indicated who your post was addressed to. I saw no addressee.
...[text shortened]... nate in Christ or His resurrection from His redemptive death.
Same difference - Contempt for God.
The rest of the paragraph is bluster.
If you read the entire post in context (including the "bluster" ), it should have been apparent to you that I was addressing C3. It is his thread after all.
Excuse me if I got the context wrong.
You did. GoaD is Ghost of a Duke. GoaD's post was not at all helpful for C3. It WAS worthless.
You really do have trouble reading in context jaywill.
@thinkofonesaid That might make sense except for the following facts:
1) Your first post on this thread was a "reply and quote" to sonship
2) Your first post to me says in part, "Chaney referenced step 3 in AA and I simply pasted that step into the thread. That's the only post I've made here". There you've explicitly referenced C3 as the person to whom you were responding.
Your ...[text shortened]... d to imagine your contribution would be much more than that of a glorified administrative assistant.
It's amusing when you repeatedly reference my work in the real world when clearly you have absolutely no idea what I do for a living. (Which is odd as I have specifically said what I do a number of times). I like how this puts you in the same category as Romans. You belong there.
But then, how could you recall what I do for a living when you can't even confirm whether or not you believe in God.
As you way oversold your knowledge of Christianity and spirituality in general, you've way oversold whatever role you may have in your purported line of work. Hard to imagine your contribution would be much more than that of a glorified administrative assistant.
Imagine what you wish about how I paid my bills.
None of it rescues you from the abject ignorance you regularly express about the New Testament.
@ghost-of-a-dukesaid It's amusing when you repeatedly reference my work in the real world when clearly you have absolutely no idea what I do for a living. (Which is odd as I have specifically said what I do a number of times). I like how this puts you in the same category as Romans. You belong there.
But then, how could you recall what I do for a living when you can't even confirm whether or not you believe in God.
Edit: What a simp.
Yet another post that serves to underscore the following as GoaD once again fails to make logical sense:
As you way oversold your knowledge of Christianity and spirituality in general, you've way oversold whatever role you may have in your purported line of work. Hard to imagine your contribution would be much more than that of a glorified administrative assistant.
Or perhaps GoaD doesn't understand the meaning of the word "purported".
Regardless GoaD has now made a case for revising the second sentence to "Hard to imagine your contribution would be even as much as that of a glorified administrative assistant". Having the wherewithal to competently process time sheets and send out schedules is likely also beyond him.
As you way oversold your knowledge of Christianity and spirituality in general, you've way oversold whatever role you may have in your purported line of work. Hard to imagine your contribution would be much more than that of a glorified administrative assistant.
Imagine what you wish about how I paid my bills.
None of it rescues you from the abject ignorance you regularly express about the New Testament.
What does my remark to GoaD have to do with how I imagine how you pay your bills?
Perhaps C3 can help YOU to find your "higher power".
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
30 Oct '18 00:427 edits
GoaD stands for Ghost of a Duke.
I misunderstood it to be a distortion of the word God.
Like Atheist Mariam OHare use to say "Gowd" when she mocked Christians. I thought you were doing that.
You really do have trouble reading in context jaywill.
I could pay closer attention to who is being addressed at times when the board takes on a chit - chatty nature.
Do you have trouble remembering people's tags?
Or is there some significance in continued usage of my old tag name - jaywill?
What is the significance of you keep addr ...[text shortened]... se to be called jaywill.
My God is the man Jesus.
https://soundcloud.com/jack-wilmore [/quote]
You brought it up just last February.
I offered the following explanation:
As I recall, in the first post you made after making the switch, you explained why it was done. Evidently some posters had not seen it and kept busting your chops even after you had tried to explain that you had, in fact, explained it earlier. I had seen the first post and I defended you.
I call you jaywill because after years of interacting with you, that's how I thought of you and continue to think of you. It's as simple as that.
Pasted from <https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/beware--red-letter-antichrists.175919/page-4#post_3841972>
You later thanked me for sticking up for you. Remember?
@thinkofonesaid Yet another post that serves to underscore the following as GoaD once again fails to make logical sense:
As you way oversold your knowledge of Christianity and spirituality in general, you've way oversold whatever role you may have in your purported line of work. Hard to imagine your contribution would be much more than that of a glorified administrative assistant.
Or ...[text shortened]... the wherewithal to competently process time sheets and send out schedules is likely also beyond him.
You inform a lot of people how they fail to make logical sense when they talk to
you. If your repeating that to a lot of different people, maybe its not everyone you
talk too, but you that has an issue with logic?
@kellyjaysaid You inform a lot of people how they fail to make logical sense when they talk to
you. If your repeating that to a lot of different people, maybe its not everyone you
talk too, but you that has an issue with logic?
How exactly does that make logical sense?
It makes much more logical sense for a given individual to show exactly how their logic is in fact sound and exactly how my logic is flawed.
What does it say about that you seldom if ever take that tack?
The fact is that there are more than a few illogical people who post on this forum and they seldom if ever take that tack either.
God and sobriety
29 Oct '18 17:375 edits
Back to Top