Go back
God and sobriety

God and sobriety

Spirituality


@fmf said
I don't call sonship "jaywill".
Thanks for sharing.

Seriously, you been feeling okay?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@thinkofone said
How exactly does that make logical sense?

It makes much more logical sense for a given individual to show exactly how their logic is in fact sound and exactly how my logic is flawed.

What does it say about that you seldom if ever take that tack?

The fact is that there are more than a few illogical people who post on this forum and they seldom if ever take that tack either.
ROFL

1 edit

@kellyjay said
ROFL
No surprise that you dodged the point of my post. Odd that that so often happens with you.


@thinkofone said
Thanks for sharing.

Seriously, you been feeling okay?
Why do you call sonship "jaywill"?


@fmf said
Why do you call sonship "jaywill"?
I suppose you could have read my response to him on the previous page.

But then, that wouldn't tickle your juvenile sensibilities as much as telling him that I'm "kicking sand in [his] face" in an effort to get a rise out of him.


@thinkofone said
I suppose you could have read my response to him on the previous page.

But then, that wouldn't tickle your juvenile sensibilities as much as telling him that I'm "kicking sand in [his] face" in an effort to get a rise out of him.
I do think you are just kicking sand in his face by using an old screen name of his. Why do you think you do it?


@fmf said
I do think you are just kicking sand in his face by using an old screen name of his. Why do you think you do it?
I do think that you are just kicking sand in his face by telling him that I'm "kicking sand in [his] face". Why do you think you do it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
He's kicking sand in your face, sonship.
@fmf said to sonship
He's kicking sand in your face, sonship.

@sonship

Judging by his reaction, I think I've hit the nail on the head.

2 edits

@thinkofone said to FMF
I suppose you could have read my response to him on the previous page.

But then, that wouldn't tickle your juvenile sensibilities as much as telling him that I'm "kicking sand in [his] face" in an effort to get a rise out of him.


@sonship

Judging by his reaction, I think I've hit the nail on the head.


@thinkofone said
Yet another post that serves to underscore the following as GoaD once again fails to make logical sense:
As you way oversold your knowledge of Christianity and spirituality in general, you've way oversold whatever role you may have in your purported line of work. Hard to imagine your contribution would be much more than that of a glorified administrative assistant.

Or ...[text shortened]... the wherewithal to competently process time sheets and send out schedules is likely also beyond him.
Curious how ToO neglects to address this part of my post:

'But then, how could you recall what I do for a living when you can't even confirm whether or not you believe in God.'


@thinkofone said
How exactly does that make logical sense?

It makes much more logical sense for a given individual to show exactly how their logic is in fact sound and exactly how my logic is flawed.

What does it say about that you seldom if ever take that tack?

The fact is that there are more than a few illogical people who post on this forum and they seldom if ever take that tack either.
How does it make logical sense to only ignore the words of Jesus, while he walked the Earth, when he speaks about being sent by God?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@ThinkOfOne

You later thanked me for sticking up for you. Remember?


A few shop keeping matters this morning.
All is said in complete honesty.

1.) No I do not remember very much about the TIME during when I began to use sonship. I recall having to explain a couple of times.

If you explained also, thanks.

2.) I figured out that GoaD stood for Ghost of a Duke. Only this morning I noticed that you plainly explained above.

3.) I plead guilty to sometimes hastily going over comments and not paying close enough attention to the addresser and addressee.

Point is taken and I will try to do better.
Mistakes like this have lead to some hurtful misdirected words for which I apologize.

4.) Most importantly, on this Forum I don't want to talk about personalities. It is a waste of time IMO to go on and on about poster's personalities.

If you haven't noticed it yet, I want to talk about Jesus.
If there is a personality I want to write pages and pages about it is the personality of Jesus Christ and the word of God.

Sticking to this principle, I have not.
I have had some failures.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
Most importantly, on this Forum I don't want to talk about personalities. It is a waste of time IMO to go on and on about poster's personalities.
When people try to discuss things with you, sometimes all you do is deflect with comments about personalities.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@FMF

When people try to discuss things with you, sometimes all you do is deflect with comments about personalities.


Thankyou.

Note above my post concluded with.

Sticking to this principle, I have not.
I have had some failures.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonship said
@FMF

When people try to discuss things with you, sometimes all you do is deflect with comments about personalities.


Thankyou.

Note above my post concluded with.

Sticking to this principle, I have not.
I have had some failures.


Now may I suggest that the next time you, yes you FMF, make a remark about my person which is injuri ...[text shortened]... orting to personal attacks. They tend to stick to the subject matter without ad hom remarks.
He basically ignored what you wrote, and just saw it as an opportunity to attack.

I noticed.