Good behaviours vs beliefs

@kellyjay said
That is your normal pattern, just as I said.

In so far as it is a "pattern", yes, far to often, I have to respond to your self-pitying, evasive nonsense. It happens almost every time you back yourself into a discursive cul-de-sac and you take flight from whatever we were talking about.

@fmf said
In so far as it is a "pattern", yes, far to often, I have to respond to your self-pitying, evasive nonsense. It happens almost every time you back yourself into a discursive cul-de-sac and you take flight from whatever we were talking about.

You should try speaking to the points instead of the person, you should try looking at the validity of the arguments instead of concerning yourself with where you think they came from. I think you have simply been justifying your actions and not looking at what was said. You have only validated my point, I am going to stop here it’s clear you feel completely right in all you are doing here, nothing said to you matters.

@kellyjay said
You should try speaking to the points instead of the person, you should try looking at the validity of the arguments instead of concerning yourself with where you think they came from.

I do address the "arguments" [which are mostly mere assertions, in fact] that you offer in support of the personal opinions you share.

@kellyjay said
I think you have simply been justifying your actions and not looking at what was said.

I am constantly looking at the substance of your personal opinions and offering mine in return.

@kellyjay said
I am going to stop here it’s clear you feel completely right in all you are doing here, nothing said to you matters.

Please do. You are correct.

@fmf said
Please do. You are correct.

I know

-Removed-

I think opinions need to be looked at individually, not according to who says them, but the soundness of the logic used, and the sources quoted. My opinion and anyone else’ should not be viewed according to who says what, instead how inline with the truth of reality is it? To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.

@kellyjay said
I think opinions need to be looked at individually, not according to who says them, but the soundness of the logic used, and the sources quoted. My opinion and anyone else’ should not be viewed according to who says what, instead how inline with the truth of reality is it? To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.

Who is it you think has rejected something "without examination"?

@kellyjay said
To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.

If you are equating rejection/disagreement with "prejudice" or if you are dismissing rejection/disagreement because of a supposed lack of examination, then that's rhetorically weak.

-Removed-

You cannot tell, seriously?

-Removed-

When I say opinions need to be looked at individually you think I am not including fmf and my opinions? Must I name each of us because you can’t grasp ours are not the only ones that matter?