03 Aug 22
@kellyjay saidIn so far as it is a "pattern", yes, far to often, I have to respond to your self-pitying, evasive nonsense. It happens almost every time you back yourself into a discursive cul-de-sac and you take flight from whatever we were talking about.
That is your normal pattern, just as I said.
@fmf saidYou should try speaking to the points instead of the person, you should try looking at the validity of the arguments instead of concerning yourself with where you think they came from. I think you have simply been justifying your actions and not looking at what was said. You have only validated my point, I am going to stop here it’s clear you feel completely right in all you are doing here, nothing said to you matters.
In so far as it is a "pattern", yes, far to often, I have to respond to your self-pitying, evasive nonsense. It happens almost every time you back yourself into a discursive cul-de-sac and you take flight from whatever we were talking about.
03 Aug 22
@kellyjay saidKellyJay, in line with your comment to FMF earlier… do you think your opinion on truth should be “held in more regard” than the opinions of others who disagree with you?
Can you avoid saying that is just an opinion, or that is just faith speech, or all of your other marginalizing verbiage and just stay on topic?
03 Aug 22
@kellyjay saidI do address the "arguments" [which are mostly mere assertions, in fact] that you offer in support of the personal opinions you share.
You should try speaking to the points instead of the person, you should try looking at the validity of the arguments instead of concerning yourself with where you think they came from.
@divegeester saidI think opinions need to be looked at individually, not according to who says them, but the soundness of the logic used, and the sources quoted. My opinion and anyone else’ should not be viewed according to who says what, instead how inline with the truth of reality is it? To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.
KellyJay, in line with your comment to FMF earlier… do you think your opinion on truth should be “held in more regard” than the opinions of others who disagree with you?
@kellyjay saidWho is it you think has rejected something "without examination"?
I think opinions need to be looked at individually, not according to who says them, but the soundness of the logic used, and the sources quoted. My opinion and anyone else’ should not be viewed according to who says what, instead how inline with the truth of reality is it? To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.
04 Aug 22
@kellyjay saidIf you are equating rejection/disagreement with "prejudice" or if you are dismissing rejection/disagreement because of a supposed lack of examination, then that's rhetorically weak.
To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.
04 Aug 22
@kellyjay saidIs that yes or a no KellyJay?
I think opinions need to be looked at individually, not according to who says them, but the soundness of the logic used, and the sources quoted. My opinion and anyone else’ should not be viewed according to who says what, instead how inline with the truth of reality is it? To reject anything by definition only without examination isn’t even addressing the topic, instead by prejudice.
@kellyjay saidI might be argumentative and annoying to some, but I’m honest kellyjay. And no, I cannot tell from what you wrote, wether you mean yes or no.
You cannot tell, seriously?
Why don’t you repost exactly what you wrote, prefixed with an unequivocal “yes” or “no”, so I know where you stand before I read the rest?
Just a suggestion.
@divegeester saidWhen I say opinions need to be looked at individually you think I am not including fmf and my opinions? Must I name each of us because you can’t grasp ours are not the only ones that matter?
I might be argumentative and annoying to some, but I’m honest kellyjay. And no, I cannot tell from what you wrote, wether you mean yes or no.
Why don’t you repost exactly what you wrote, prefixed with an unequivocal “yes” or “no”, so I know where you stand before I read the rest?
Just a suggestion.