Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeThe amusing thing is that I have given Fetchmyjunk an example of when I think lying is not an immoral act on this thread - a matter of hald an hour or so ago - and I even reposted it when he ignored it - and he seems absolutely determined not to discuss it and instead wants to go off and say he's finding moments in time when I didn't give him an example. Very odd.
On the 8th September last year sir, not once did you mention aubergines.
I think you will agree, I've won this argument.
Originally posted by FMFAll I want to know from you is this: under what conditions would it not be acceptable to lie in your opinion?
Was there nothing in my scenario that you thought you might address specifically, in the spirit of discussing something, as it were, aside from simply asking the disingenuous question above? You asked me a question and I answered it head on and then you just ignored it. Here was that scenario:
"Someone bent my ear for four hours last night about his pending d ...[text shortened]... ite to hear him trawl through the same litany of complaints and injustices two nights in a row."
Originally posted by FMFYou have given me one example you when you think lying is not immoral. This has no bearing on when you believe it is immoral to lie. That is what I am specifically interested in.
Why have you blanked out my answer to this question which I posted on page 10 and then reposted in order to draw your attention to it, which you also blanked out?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkTo spare someone's feelings (as in the example I gave); to protect my family from harm; to stop or divert someone from doing something morally unsound; to postpone discussing the truth until a more opportune time; to anyone threatening me or trying to coerce me with violence or some other kind of damage (for example); to not disturb community sensibilities or avoid a pointless debate; stuff like that, and that's just off the top of my head as I type here.
... under what conditions would it not be acceptable to lie in your opinion?
edit: I think lying is morally unsound but the above examples would be exceptions in my view
Originally posted by FMFI think you have misunderstood my question. I asked when is it not acceptable to lie?
To spare someone's feelings (as in the example I gave); to protect my family from harm; to stop or divert someone from doing something morally unsound; to postpone discussing the truth until a more opportune time; to anyone threatening me or trying to coerce me with violence or some other kind of damage (for example); to not disturb community sensibilities or av ...[text shortened]...
edit: I think lying is morally unsound but the above examples would be exceptions in my view
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkYou asked me when is it immoral and when is it not immoral and - seeing as I clearly and consistently cite deception as morally unsound - I gave you an example of how it might not be a moral issue to tell someone something that wasn't true. But you just ignored this attempt of mine to discuss the topic.
I think you have misunderstood my question. I asked when is it not acceptable to lie?
Originally posted by FMFBut why would you say 'deception' is morally unsound in general?
You asked me when is it immoral and when is it not immoral and - seeing as I clearly and consistently cite deception as morally unsound - I gave you an example of how it might not be a moral issue to tell someone something that wasn't true. But you just ignored this attempt of mine to discuss the topic.
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkIf you could just somehow recall any of the numerous times I have offered my views on morality and my justifications for it you'd already know the answer. Indeed, I have no doubt you do already know the answer but you think asking disingenuous question after asking disingenuous question constitutes discourse. Why are you still blanking out all the examples of my viewpoint that I have fed into our discussion?
But why would you say 'deception' is morally unsound in general?