Huge anti-gay marriage protest march in Paris

Originally posted by stellspalfie
non of these explain the effects on the child. what effects does having homosexual parents have on a child?

may i suggest that you read them again or visit spec savers. This thread is about opposition to homosexual marriage.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I would say it's beyond cold, more like verging on evil.

mere unsubstantiated opinion.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
it is stomach churning. im not sure where a religion that would rather see their children die than give them a blood transfusion gets off telling homosexuals that they would be bad parents.

i know who i would rather raise my kids if i had to choose.

more mere opinion, you have not been able to cobble together a single argument and instead now resort to irrelevancies,

oh well, dont ask me what i think of you , i might not give the answer that you want me to.

When you can think of anything other than your own opinions, for God knows they must have meaning to someone somewhere, let us know.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
more mere opinion, you have not been able to cobble together a single argument and instead now resort to irrelevancies,

oh well, dont ask me what i think of you , i might not give the answer that you want me to.

When you can think of anything other than your own opinions, for God knows they must have meaning to someone somewhere, let us know.

what effects does having homosexual parents have on a child?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
more mere opinion, you have not been able to cobble together a single argument and instead now resort to irrelevancies,

oh well, dont ask me what i think of you , i might not give the answer that you want me to.

When you can think of anything other than your own opinions, for God knows they must have meaning to someone somewhere, let us know.

it is a simple matter of robbieism.

we did provide arguments. we also pointed out how you don't have any, in fact you claim you don't even have opinions on the matter (only to post your oppinions on the matter mere seconds after).

here is where the robbieism kicks in: your position is flimsy, your arguments flawed when they are even provided, yet you think you are winning because the robbie says the robbie is winning.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
mere unsubstantiated opinion.

Call it what you want, that is my view.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Call it what you want, that is my view.

and i am sure it has meaning to someone, somewhere.

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
it is a simple matter of robbieism.

we did provide arguments. we also pointed out how you don't have any, in fact you claim you don't even have opinions on the matter (only to post your oppinions on the matter mere seconds after).

here is where the robbieism kicks in: your position is flimsy, your arguments flawed when they are even provided, yet you think you are winning because the robbie says the robbie is winning.

try to make reference to the arguments that were provided Zippy, who knows you may do better, your opinion, if unsubstantiated, is meaningless to me.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
what effects does having homosexual parents have on a child?

it depends which study you ask, i provided a study, in fact it detailed various reasons why it may be detrimental to children, you may make reference to that. I will not do so again and again and again.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
and i am sure it has meaning to someone, somewhere.

This is what we do here isn't it? Present our views on the ongoing discussion or have I missed something?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
This is what we do here isn't it? Present our views on the ongoing discussion.

yes, but views unless they can be substantiated are essentially meaningless.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
it depends which study you ask, i provided a study, in fact it detailed various reasons why it may be detrimental to children, you may make reference to that. I will not do so again and again and again.

what points struck you as being key?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
what points struck you as being key?

sorry this is another personal perspective question, i am interested in evidence, uninterested in personal opinions, have i not made that clear enough for you? How clear would it need to be? tattoo on the forehead, electric shock every time you violate it? hmmmm

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sorry this is another personal perspective question, i am interested in evidence, uninterested in personal opinions, have i not made that clear enough for you? How clear would it need to be? tattoo on the forehead, electric shock every time you violate it? hmmmm

are j.w's able to study at a higher education level?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes, but views unless they can be substantiated are essentially meaningless.

I couldn't give a hoot whether you think they are meaningless or not, that you would rather see children remain in care than go to a same sex couple is wicked beyond reproach. The evidence for abuse and negligence suffered by children in some sort if foster home is beyond denial. For example -

In one study in the United Kingdom "foster children were 7–8 times, and children in residential care 6 times more likely to be assessed by a pediatrician for abuse than a child in the general population"

and

Former child welfare clients were in year of birth and sex standardised risk ratios (RRs) four to five times more likely than peers in the general population to have been hospitalised for suicide attempts....Individuals who had been in long-term foster care tended to have the most dismal outcome...former child welfare/protection clients should be considered a high-risk group for suicide attempts and severe psychiatric morbidity.

And on and on.........

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foster_care#Abuse_and_negligence