Huge anti-gay marriage protest march in Paris

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I am uninterested in proffering opinion, i prefer evidence, if evidence is not good enough for you then so be it, its good enough for me.

what method did you use to ascertain that the evidence you used was good enough?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
what method did you use to ascertain that the evidence you used was good enough?

i read the details of the report.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you asked me a personal viewpoint question, you did, one can only presume in the hope of getting a personal opinion did you not. If you like i shall retract all personal opinions, it means very little to me and i would be pleased if you proffered some evidence instead on the continual and somewhat tedious exercise of having to answer all your perosnal viewpoint questions.

there is nothing wrong with a personal viewpoint. especially if the personal view point has been formulated through education and can be backed up.

i personally have 4 adopted nieces and nephews, gay friends with children, 2 relatives who are social workers, 2 relatives that have fostered children, a wife who has a masters in child behavioral studies, a relative who's had sperm donation from a gay couples. ive got a tonne of experience from listening and learning from these people........and not one agrees with you.

you have.......one line of text saying 'man laying with man is unnatural' and you form an opinion based around that. pathetic.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i read the details of the report.

but the report concludes itself that the methods used were not conclusive????? but you decided they were conclusive anyway???? fk me...and you have the cheek to call other people window lickers.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
there is nothing wrong with a personal viewpoint. especially if the personal view point has been formulated through education and can be backed up.

i personally have 4 adopted nieces and nephews, gay friends with children, 2 relatives who are social workers, 2 relatives that have fostered children, a wife who has a masters in child behavioral studie ...[text shortened]... aying 'man laying with man is unnatural' and you form an opinion based around that. pathetic.

ummm i am not the evidence that i produce, your inability to separate the person from the evidence is truly staggering. Have you always had problems with a lack of objectivity? If chess teaches you anything, it should teach you to remain objective at all times.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ummm i am not the evidence that i produce, your inability to separate the person from the evidence is truly staggering. Have you always had problems with a lack of objectivity? If chess teaches you anything, it should teach you to remain objective at all times.

hehe, you dont have a clue do you. you need to go back to school robbie learn how the big boys use their brains.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
call it what you like, i resent using emotive subjects like children to further your gay parade. Here is what was actually cited,


It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised ...[text shortened]... evolution aimed at changing people's view of homosexuality."

when will you admit it?[/b]

My gay parade? What are you talking about? You stated you would prefer to see a child remain in care rather than be adopted by a same sex couple. This is what I've been discussing, I have no idea what you're talking about.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
My gay parade? What are you talking about? You stated you would prefer to see a child remain in care rather than be adopted by a same sex couple. This is what I've been discussing, I have no idea what you're talking about.

sure yah dont.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
sure yah dont.

Are you claiming I'm lying?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Are you claiming I'm lying?

Its not about you.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not about you.

More deflection. Try again.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
More deflection. Try again.

nope, i try my best not to refer to personalities, my text was perfectly clear.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
nope, i try my best not to refer to personalities, my text was perfectly clear.

It wasn't clear to me, can you just clarify please.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no are you saying that loving biological parent are not the best?

You answer my question with a question and distort what I posted!

I am trying to ascertain your position which was unclear.

I have not put forward my own opinion.
But for the record there is no reason why "loving biological" is any better than loving adoptive.

Now, I ask again, do you think my son would be better off with his biological parents?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
You answer my question with a question and distort what I posted!

I am trying to ascertain your position which was unclear.

I have not put forward my own opinion.
But for the record there is no reason why "loving biological" is any better than loving adoptive.

Now, I ask again, do you think my son would be better off with his biological parents?

that depends on whether or not you make the list of people suited for parenting. abusive junkie foster parents apparently make the list. a couple that doesn't have exactly one penis in its roster apparently doesn't.