Originally posted by robbie carrobiei dont see anywhere that you have highlighted in what way the child is effected and what this means for them in later life?
i have already outlined one point, only swiss gambit attempted to dismantle it.
you have mentioned not having a female role model. so tell me, what happens if you do not have female role model?
Originally posted by stellspalfiethese are your opinions and figures not mine i would be pleased if you kept me personally out of your attempts to substantiate any claims have for allowing gay adoption/marriage. Any further references or solicitations for personal opinion will be ignored.
you dont know what the negative effects are.........yet you know they are worse than if a child is not adopted, which 50% of the time results in drugs and prison.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou said biological parents were the first choice in your hierarchy of good-parenting. Have you changed your mind?
I would never be as insensitive to call into question your parenting wolfie, really, not for a second, i have admiration for anyone who can adopt a kid, but you are not gay and you have provided natures best, a loving home with a father and a mother in the absence of biological parents.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell, we've at least whittled it down to possible, but depraved. Baby steps. 🙂
I dont care what they do, it does not make it natural, the human physiology is the defining criteria for what is natural, not what some depraved couples do. Porn is for window lickers!
Originally posted by stellspalfieit just seemed that something people do on this site. you argue with someone defending a position so freakin ridiculous, and they are so oblivious to that fact that one is willing to surrender on some aspects of their own position knowing full well their side of the debate would still be much stronger.
dont worry im not negotiating. i have no issues at all with homosexual adoption. just interested to see how illogical robbies views go.
this leads nowhere. you only dilute your position so much in the hopes they will agree with you in the distant future, when your position is pretty much completely different. from there, it is very hard to backtrack and odds are great he won't see your point better if coming from the other direction.
i tried your method of debating with them in flood debates, evolution debates. they are oblivious.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethey are human beings just like straight people? what sex is engaged between the parents is never a factor in the education of children?
no they shouldn't, there are zillions of reasons why they shouldn't, you have not proffered one good reason why they should, except because you say they should.
that is more than enough.
Originally posted by stellspalfieThey are scared for life and doomed to faii into the pit of Hell.
i dont see anywhere that you have highlighted in what way the child is effected and what this means for them in later life?
you have mentioned not having a female role model. so tell me, what happens if you do not have female role model?
The instructor
Originally posted by robbie carrobieoh damn, i had everyone convinced you don't see gay people as capable of providing love and parenting, but you had to come and say i lie.
i see, you resort to misrepresenting what i have said, typical and ineffectual.
all your posts stating exactly that are null and void because of this one mighty response.