Go back
Hypothesis/Theory

Hypothesis/Theory

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
That's probably because he is a secular humanist and not Christian. 😏
Ah, the vast atheist conspiracy is hiding all his frauds and keeping him out of jail. Who would have known.


Originally posted by sonhouse
Ah, the vast atheist conspiracy is hiding all his frauds and keeping him out of jail. Who would have known.
Not any atheists, that is for sure. 😏


Originally posted by RJHinds
Here are a few examples of Dawkins lies:

Dawkins Caught In a Lie!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJY4kLkHrnI

Dawkins Caught Lying for Darwin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnYik52Y5rI

Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Richard Dawkins Nailed by Prof Lennox Samuel

Dawkins ...[text shortened]... ist then takes that back here (See about 9:30 on)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiIRHTZwlTw
Your comments critical of Dawkins are specious. It's very hard to take seriously a believer in virgin births and resurrections! You still have not explained how god got here!


Originally posted by 667joe
Your comments critical of Dawkins are specious. It's very hard to take seriously a believer in virgin births and resurrections! You still have not explained how god got here!
God is eternal.

Resurrections are not common, but the Shroud of Turin is one of the proofs of the resurrection of Christ.

Virgin births are no longer rare

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20141219-spectacular-real-virgin-births


Originally posted by RJHinds
God is eternal.

Resurrections are not common, but the Shroud of Turin is one of the proofs of the resurrection of Christ.

Virgin births are no longer rare

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20141219-spectacular-real-virgin-births
/facepalm


Originally posted by 667joe
Your comments critical of Dawkins are specious. It's very hard to take seriously a believer in virgin births and resurrections! You still have not explained how god got here!
I don't know if anyone's told you this, or maybe you're new here, but comparing God to/with humans doesn't exactly work. It's apples and oranges.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
I don't know if anyone's told you this, or maybe you're new here, but comparing God to/with humans doesn't exactly work. It's apples and oranges.
How did I compare god to humans?

5 edits

Originally posted by 667joe
How did I compare god to humans?
Maybe she is referring to this past post:
[i]Originally posted by 667joe[i]
If god could always exist without being created, why is is not possible that is true for other entities?

Then:
Originally posted by 667joe
Your comments critical of Dawkins are specious. It's very hard to take seriously a believer in virgin births and resurrections! You still have not explained how god got here!

My answer was:
God is eternal


I suspect she took "other entities" to include "humans".

Vote Up
Vote Down

God is eternal is not an answer.


Originally posted by 667joe
God is eternal is not an answer.
Okay the Holy Bible says God came done from the spiritual heaven to the physical earh. But the exact mode of transportation is not given. Perhaps we could speculate that God came down from the spiritual heaven in a UFO. But only God knows and He ain't telling. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Okay the Holy Bible says God came done from the spiritual heaven to the physical earh. But the exact mode of transportation is not given. Perhaps we could speculate that God came down from the spiritual heaven in a UFO. But only God knows and He ain't telling. 😏
No doubt "Dr" Hovind's has a youtube contribution that gives compelling evidence that God's mode of transport was a giant space hopper.

You will of course vouch for its validity.


Originally posted by 667joe
How did I compare god to humans?
"It's very hard to take seriously a believer in virgin births and resurrections!"

It is for regular humans. Not so the Christ.


Originally posted by Suzianne
[b]"It's very hard to take seriously a believer in virgin births and resurrections!"

It is for regular humans. Not so the Christ.[/b]
Very good. You are indeed an intelligent woman. I didn't pick up on that either.

You mean that it may be hard to believe in virgin births for ordinary humans. But the virgin birth of Christ was performed by a miracle of God through the Holy Spirit overshadowing Mary and creating the embryo in her womb eliminating the need for the male sperm.

So comparing what God can do with the works of man is like comparing apples to oranges or some other different things.


Originally posted by RJHinds
Very good. You are indeed an intelligent woman. I didn't pick up on that either.

You mean that it may be hard to believe in virgin births for ordinary humans. But the virgin birth of Christ was performed by a miracle of God through the Holy Spirit overshadowing Mary and creating the embryo in her womb eliminating the need for the male sperm.

So compa ...[text shortened]... can do with the works of man is like comparing apples to oranges or some other different things.
Thank you, Captain Obvious. 🙂


Originally posted by Suzianne
Thank you, Captain Obvious. 🙂
You are welcome and i hope we all understand you now. 🙂