15 Oct 11
You cannot debate and argue falsity.
People want me to get involved with debating their silly beliefs - and I cannot.
And how can I enquire from someone who will not admit that animal cruelty is wrong - and when they actually also defends this - even after I have demolished any argument that they have put forward in defence of animal cruelty.
They are not the persons to make enquiry from. (they are ignorant and insincere)
They complain all the time about ....why I don't get involved and debate with their ideas - but their ideas are mostly false and only time wasting and are only posted to bait me into an endless go nowhere discussion.
I have given many posts that would allow a lively discussion about spirituality - but no one is interested to acknowledge the post - to discuss.
They are simply interested in arguing their silly and false beliefs.
This is their insincerity and foolishness and I will not be part of it.
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by DasaAnata wa totemo bakayaro
You cannot debate and argue falsity.
People want me to get involved with debating their silly beliefs - and I cannot.
And how can I enquire from someone who will not admit that animal cruelty is wrong - and when they actually also defends this - even after I have demolished any argument that they have put forward in defence of animal cruelty.
They are ...[text shortened]... y and false beliefs.
This is their insincerity and foolishness and I will not be part of it.
15 Oct 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Dasa
People want me to get involved with debating their silly beliefs - and I cannot.
...
I have given many posts that would allow a lively discussion about spirituality - but no one is interested to acknowledge the post - to discuss.
now you know why.
i must admit, you have given one or two topics worthy of discussion, but you run away from them as soon as a discussion begins and valid points are brought up that require you to reassess your original assertions.
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by DasaI am unaware of anybody in this community who supports animal cruelty as it is conventionally defined. If you cannot accept that non-vegetarians can be spiritual people and that they simply do not accept your subjective assertions about there being a "spirituality" based prohibition on eating meat, I am not really sure what it is you want to achieve here. This is a community made up of people with diverse beliefs and spiritual paths. Trying to homogenize or browbeat people into conformity or submission to your own chosen beliefs and your spiritual path is surely a hiding to nothing.
And how can I enquire from someone who will not admit that animal cruelty is wrong - and when they actually also defends this - even after I have demolished any argument that they have put forward in defence of animal cruelty.
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by FMFYes, this point has been laboured to the point of absurdity. Just accept that people eat meat ,Dasa, and lets move on.
I am unaware of anybody in this community who supports animal cruelty as it is conventionally defined. If you cannot accept that non-vegetarians can be spiritual people and that they simply do not accept your subjective assertions about there being a "spirituality" based prohibition on eating meat, I am not really sure what it is you want to achieve here. This i ...[text shortened]... r submission to your own chosen beliefs and your spiritual path is surely a hiding to nothing.
Originally posted by karoly aczelDo you ever worry that a preposterous and self-regarding OP like this inspiring such a wishy-washy response from you might make you look like one of the more "silly" persons in this community? Does it ever cross your mind, even if you discount it? 😀
I see both sides of that fence that should be a bit less silly with thier posting.
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by FMFIt crossed my mind. It was a general comment and I stand by it.
Do you ever worry that a preposterous and self-regarding OP like this can inspire such a wishy-washy response from you might make you look a like one of the more "silly" persons in this community? Does it ever cross your mind, even if you discount it? 😀
15 Oct 11
1 edit
Originally posted by karoly aczelWhy not say it to him rather than tucking it away in a comment addressed to me? It sometimes seems like you are somehow afraid Dasa might say mean things to you.
Yes, this point has been laboured to the point of absurdity. Just accept that people eat meat ,Dasa, and lets move on.
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by FMFOops, sorry. Just a habit of trying to asnwer 2 posts with one. Maybe unapt this time.
Why not say it to him rather than tucking it away in a comment addressed to me? It sometimes seems like you are somehow afraid Dasa might say mean things to you.
Dasa has said mean things to me. I dont mind. Really.
You said something a bit mean inferring I may be "silly" , but I took no offence. I thought about it. Well it could be interpretted as a bit mean, but maybe you differ?
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by FMFI dont discount that I may be seen as one of the more silly posters on this site.
Do you ever worry that a preposterous and self-regarding OP like this inspiring such a wishy-washy response from you might make you look like one of the more "silly" persons in this community? Does it ever cross your mind, even if you discount it? 😀
I'm not out there to look good. I just am what I am and I try to be honest and have made corrections where I saw they were needed.
15 Oct 11
1 edit
Originally posted by karoly aczelDasa's OP basically says that he is right and that people who disagree with what he says are silly, ignorant, insincere, false, dishonest and foolish etc. You then say you can see both sides of the fence? Who - out of those who stand up to Dasa's abusive persona - does anything remotely equivalent to calling virtually everybody silly, ignorant, insincere, false, dishonest and foolish etc? How is there any equivalency at all in terms of decency? How is there any equivalency at all in terms of "silliness"? Or were you just being silly about this with your comment about "both sides of that fence"? 😀
You said something a bit mean inferring I may be "silly" , but I took no offence. I thought about it. Well it could be interpretted as a bit mean, but maybe you differ?
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by FMFI said "SOME silly comments from both sides". Off the top of my head I was thinking of amolv06 and not you at all.
Dasa's OP basically says that he is right and that people who disagree with what he says are silly, ignorant, insincere, false, dishonest and foolish etc. You then say you can see both sides of the fence? Who - out of those who stand up to Dasa's abusive persona - does anything remotely equivalent to calling virtually everybody silly, ignorant, insincere, false, ...[text shortened]... ere you just being silly about this with your comment about "both sides of that fence"? 😀
15 Oct 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelI don't care in the slightest if you are referring to me or not. I am more interested in the fatuousness of what you sometimes say, and that in your apparent efforts to be 'decent' and all-things-to-all-people that you run the risk of representing nothing and inadvertently strengthening the hand of indecency.
I said "SOME silly comments from both sides". Off the top of my head I was thinking of amolv06 and not you at all.