Go back
If animals weren't meant to be eaten...

If animals weren't meant to be eaten...

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
I've always said, if you shoot it then eat it.......unless its the likes of Gadafi. Just looking at the man my guess is he is not very tasty. 😛
What, does he turn your stomach?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no, i am asking you whether you found your non marinated, unseasoned, grilled fish as
tasty as a cream cake. I have dictated nothing to you nor poured scorn on any of your
preferences.
I fail to see what relevance that question has to do with what we're discussing. But, to be honest, i'm not a big cream cake fan, if it was a chocolate brownie or something similar that would be tough.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I fail to see what relevance that question has to do with what we're discussing. But, to be honest, i'm not a big cream cake fan, if it was a chocolate brownie or something similar that would be tough.
Lol

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
Why did God make them taste so sweet?
The OP presupposes that God created animals for the eating pleasure of mankind.
The poster probably thinks that God is some kind of butler bringing up a new dish for the taste of the master.
What a presumptuous view ! I know that the poster is an atheist but surely there are limits to what one can say in these matters.
The poster has also constantly described how tasty the beef that he has eaten. From the id and other matter in his posts, the poster appears to be a young Hindu with the first name of Amol. Amol means " the one who cannot be valued at all or is indescribably precious ". Amol, do not be a slave of your tongue so much that you lose all sense of proportion. From an elder Hindu, who means well.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Rajk999
'Sweet meats' is a East Indian expression that has no existance in the Bible. In the Bible 'meat' means the flesh of animals. Peter had a vision in which he was told to 'kill and eat' animals. But it also had another meaning that Peter should accept the Gentiles as part of Gods plan. Both the literal meaning and spiritual meaning are Biblical and correct:
...[text shortened]... ke unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. [/i]
The vedas are the first religious teachings on earth, and were here long before the Bible, and they have lots of knowledge and truth, so I think the Bible was influenced by the Vedas a lot and I know sweat meats are used to describe SWEETS in many cultures especially India and Veda was taught in the middle east 2000 years ago as well and all languages are influenced by the Vedic language.
I have talked to someone about this a long time ago and the Bible was referring to sweets when they said sweet meats and they were not talking about meat at all.
I am a vegetarian and gave up meat many years ago and feel better for it, and the Bible should tell people not to kill animals because they have the commandments to instruct them to stop killing and should follow that.
I have been watching TV and it is saying that the treatment of animals overseas is terrible at the abattoirs.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by poker87
I have been watching TV and it is saying that the treatment of animals overseas is terrible at the abattoirs.
Where is "overseas"? This is a U.K. based international web site.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rvsakhadeo
What a presumptuous view ! I know that the poster is an atheist but surely there are limits to what one can say in these matters.
What "limits" do you propose?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Where is "overseas"? This is a U.K. based international web site.
In Asia somewhere and they showed pictures on TV of cattle being hit on the head with whips and treated badly and it looked terrified.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by poker87
In Asia somewhere and they showed pictures on TV of cattle being hit on the head with whips and treated badly and it looked terrified.
Was it that TV documentary that was screened in Australia - Sydney, Brisbane, Perth... nationally?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Was it that TV documentary that was screened in Australia - Sydney, Brisbane, Perth... nationally?
Yes it was have you also seen it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
Why did God make them taste so sweet?
To tempt you into sinning so he can fry you in hell and eat you too.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
To tempt you into sinning so he can fry you in hell and eat you too.
I would be the best damn meal that spunk-tard has ever eaten!

5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

The OP presupposes that God created animals for the eating pleasure of mankind.


As you've indicated in your post, I'm an atheist. I "presuppose" no such thing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
I would be the best damn meal that spunk-tard has ever eaten!
You must be special.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by amolv06
[b]The OP presupposes that God created animals for the eating pleasure of mankind.


As you've indicated in your post, I'm an atheist. I "presuppose" no such thing.[/b]
I would think an atheist would never say, "Why did God make them taste so sweet?"

Logically, "God" wouldn't be in an atheists vocabulary much less as a pseudo topic of discussion.