07 Oct '17 01:25>
Originally posted by @vivifyWould he look more like 1 hour old or 20 years old?
No idea.
Third dodge noted.
Originally posted by @eladarSo I guess the way for you to keep on believing in your faith is to dodge any questions that make you actually think about it.
Would he look more like 1 hour old or 20 years old?
Originally posted by @vivifyI answered your question.
So I guess the way for you to keep on believing in your faith is to dodge any questions that make you actually think about it.
Originally posted by @eladarEarth: around 4 billion years.
Really? What do you mean by that? How long did it take the earth to form and the stars to fill the night's aky?
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemIndeed. People who take the 'days' of creation literally simply don't understand how 'day' is used elsewhere in the bible.
Earth: around 4 billion years.
Stars: they have a variety of ages.
I am taking the tack that the Divine Creation account of the Bible does not contradict scientific findings. This means that I do not interpret the days of creation as literal days.
In Daniel 9, if it is a prophecy of Jesus being the Messiah, then the weeks are not literal weeks, but "weeks of years". I will interpret the Genesis days in similar fashion.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe writer knew what a day was, people simply refuse to acknowledge God's creation.
Indeed. People who take the 'days' of creation literally simply don't understand how 'day' is used elsewhere in the bible.
Originally posted by @eladarExactly as he looked the moment he was created. Brand new, and Adam would have remained looking new forever if he hadn't disobeyed God.
How old would Adam have looked moments after creation?
Originally posted by @kellyjaySo, your assertion is that 'day' in the bible always means a literal day? (Careful now. Perhaps do a little research before answering).
The writer knew what a day was, people simply refuse to acknowledge God's creation.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeLOL, you should talk when it comes to scripture. I've done the research.
So, your assertion is that 'day' in the bible always means a literal day? (Careful now. Perhaps do a little research before answering).
Originally posted by @bigdoggproblemGod created each with its age at that moment.
Earth: around 4 billion years.
Stars: they have a variety of ages.
I am taking the tack that the Divine Creation account of the Bible does not contradict scientific findings. This means that I do not interpret the days of creation as literal days.
In Daniel 9, if it is a prophecy of Jesus being the Messiah, then the weeks are not literal weeks, but "weeks of years". I will interpret the Genesis days in similar fashion.
Originally posted by @josephwI asked physical age. Would he appear to be 3? Would he appear to be about 8?
Exactly as he looked the moment he was created. Brand new, and Adam would have remained looking new forever if he hadn't disobeyed God.
Everything looks old now.
Originally posted by @kellyjay🙂
LOL, you should talk when it comes to scripture. I've done the research.
Originally posted by @eladarGod created the universe with each piece having the maturity it needed to sustain itself
God created each with its age at that moment.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe arguments you try to make here are the arguments of a simpleton.
🙂
In Matt 24:37 we have 'days' referring to an era - "As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man." (While in Genesis 8:22 we have 'day' as the span of human history).
Isiah 9:4 of course uses 'day' to record a memorable event - "For as in the day of Midian’s defeat, you have shattered the yoke that burdens th ...[text shortened]... through on his intention ( Jer 31:35-37 ) '
http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/day/