09 Dec 13
Originally posted by Hand of HecateIf we can kill it, it wouldn't be much of a god.
For the sake of simplicity lets assume there is one God and we, as humans can't begin to fathom its true nature. We are crippled after all trying to define the glory and terror of God on terms we understand.
Back to business. Yes kill all aspects of God for the greater good.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
09 Dec 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSooo... Your evidence is a link to a thread which basically concludes that Kasparov
That's correct as a man of science and empiric's I do value evidence,
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/kasparov-vs-deep-blue--foul-play
was simply a sore looser...
I am not sure you mean the same thing I do by the word 'evidence'.
09 Dec 13
Originally posted by googlefudgehardly if you watched the video evidence you would conclude that there unanswered details, like why did IBM refuse to hand over the machines data, why did it play like a patzer game 1 and like a human game 2, why did it miss a simple perpetual check?
Sooo... Your evidence is a link to a thread which basically concludes that Kasparov
was simply a sore looser...
I am not sure you mean the same thing I do by the word 'evidence'.
09 Dec 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieJust put on your tin foil hat, robbie, and don't worry, be happy.
hardly if you watched the video evidence you would conclude that there unanswered details, like why did IBM refuse to hand over the machines data, why did it play like a patzer game 1 and like a human game 2, why did it miss a simple perpetual check?