If you could kill God...

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
For the sake of simplicity lets assume there is one God and we, as humans can't begin to fathom its true nature. We are crippled after all trying to define the glory and terror of God on terms we understand.

Back to business. Yes kill all aspects of God for the greater good.

If we can kill it, it wouldn't be much of a god.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
That's correct as a man of science and empiric's I do value evidence,

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/kasparov-vs-deep-blue--foul-play

Sooo... Your evidence is a link to a thread which basically concludes that Kasparov
was simply a sore looser...

I am not sure you mean the same thing I do by the word 'evidence'.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
If we can kill it, it wouldn't be much of a god.

I'd say that both you and HoH are close to a more subtle truth, but yet I cannot see that either of you are that skilled at parables.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
If we can kill it, it wouldn't be much of a god.

Hmmm. Interesting.

Are you saying that unkillablity is a fundamental property of a god?

Because I think the Norse would take issue with that....

Among others.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Sooo... Your evidence is a link to a thread which basically concludes that Kasparov
was simply a sore looser...

I am not sure you mean the same thing I do by the word 'evidence'.

Inigo Montoya is pissed that you keep trying to steal his line.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Sooo... Your evidence is a link to a thread which basically concludes that Kasparov
was simply a sore looser...

I am not sure you mean the same thing I do by the word 'evidence'.

hardly if you watched the video evidence you would conclude that there unanswered details, like why did IBM refuse to hand over the machines data, why did it play like a patzer game 1 and like a human game 2, why did it miss a simple perpetual check?

Originally posted by googlefudge
Hmmm. Interesting.

Are you saying that unkillablity is a fundamental property of a god?

Because I think the Norse would take issue with that....

Among others.

Not fundamental ... just required for awesomeness. I'm not very afraid of a god I can kill.

Originally posted by Suzianne
I'd say that both you and HoH are close to a more subtle truth, but yet I cannot see that either of you are that skilled at parables.

Thank god (not the killable one) that we have you to explain shtuff to us, the parablically retarded. 😕

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Wouldn't you have to?

Wouldn't that be God committing suicide by proxy?

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Wouldn't you have to?

It would be easier to kill all the people who believed in it, wouldn't it? D'ya think it'd die if it got forgot?

Romans claim to have killed God two millenia ago

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hardly if you watched the video evidence you would conclude that there unanswered details, like why did IBM refuse to hand over the machines data, why did it play like a patzer game 1 and like a human game 2, why did it miss a simple perpetual check?

Just put on your tin foil hat, robbie, and don't worry, be happy.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Just put on your tin foil hat, robbie, and don't worry, be happy.

You should loan him yours if the apocalypse doesn't pan out.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
You should loan him yours if the apocalypse doesn't pan out.

ooooooooooooh, nice one 🙂

Originally posted by Suzianne
ooooooooooooh, nice one 🙂

It's the only thing that keeps me posting here. 😵