Originally posted by @pudgenikMarried homosexuals are in relationships that are a "figment of their imagination"? Explain.
There are a few avenues that can be brought up both for and against homosexuality. On the for side, there can be love... and im sure there are a few with a deep commitment towards each other. but there are two problems with this. The first being worse. Sexual intercoarse, there is none, except the perverse. And the second, thinking themselves to be husband and wife or similar. It is a figment of the imagination, it warps the phycie
Originally posted by @pudgenik"Perverse"? You mean you really, really don't like it, right?
There are a few avenues that can be brought up both for and against homosexuality. On the for side, there can be love... and im sure there are a few with a deep commitment towards each other. but there are two problems with this. The first being worse. Sexual intercoarse, there is none, except the perverse.
Originally posted by @pudgenikNegligent endangerment or wilfully spreading disease would clearly be morally unsound behaviours.
Other issues that are vaguely addressed, the number of diseases that stem from the act of so called '' intercoarse''. There is so much politics involved, the education on this is lax at best. These diseases worse than hiv are its mutated offspring.
Originally posted by @pudgenikWhat's morally unsound about switching partners, in and of itself? Deceiving people, breaking promises, taking advantage of people, infecting people with disease, emotional blackmail etc. - such aspects of both homosexual and heterosexual relationships are morally unsound, but how is switching partners, in and of itself, morally wrong?
switching partners often is also common in that lifestyle.
Originally posted by @fmfYou don’t think one follows the other? Come on, Kiddo.
What's morally unsound about switching partners, in and of itself? Deceiving people, breaking promises, taking advantage of people, infecting people with disease, emotional blackmail etc. - such aspects of both homosexual and heterosexual relationships are morally unsound, but how is switching partners, in and of itself, morally wrong?
1 edit
Originally posted by @pudgenikPresumably, then, you think Ghost of a Duke and his wife are immoral people for not having any children. If they had only one child, would they still be immoral on account of the fact that, if every couple did that, the population would decrease and perhaps it could eventually be "the end of mankind"?
What stands against homosexuality are many things, both the seen and unseen. Just on the human aspects alone, it is a very selfish act. There are no offspring, no continuation of the species. If everyone did this, it would be the end of mankind.
Originally posted by @pudgenikIn what circumstances exactly might homosexuality mean "the end of mankind"? Be clear, please.
Originally posted by @pudgenik
What stands against homosexuality are many things, both the seen and unseen. Just on the human aspects alone, it is a very selfish act. There are no offspring, no continuation of the species. If everyone did this, it would be the end of mankind.
Originally posted by @fmfPudgenik, pay no mind to the way that FMF will focus in on these little things.
"Perverse"? You mean you really, really don't like it, right?
FMF, are you suggesting that something perverse cannot meaningfully exist?
Would you not say that a pedophile has a perverted sense of sexuality?
Would it not be possible that this word applies to all manner of other orientations?
FMF: So what are your non-religious moral arguments?No, I didn't. You mentioned some things that you don't like or that you are worried about but you didn't offer any moral arguments.
Originally posted by @philokalia
You backed off on this on page like... 2 or 3.
Originally posted by @philokaliaI think having sex with children is perverse, for example.
FMF, are you suggesting that something perverse cannot meaningfully exist?
Originally posted by @philokaliaI have been posting throughout the 21 pages of this thread and discussing the topic with people. I haven't "left off" at all.
Do you want to pick up where we left off?