Originally posted by robbie carrobiecouldn't one simply do that with the plethora of known and trusted translations? No Robbo, you are being intellectually dishonest
by reading the text and making an evaluation withour own minds, otherwise all you
are doing is taking it upon trust, that is why its important to name , not the translators,
as if that tells you anything about the textual integrity, but the actual documents
themselves.
3 edits
Originally posted by Dowardknown and trusted translations? excuse me i have a mind of my own and yes i even try
couldn't one simply do that with the plethora of known and trusted translations? No Robbo, you are being intellectually dishonest
to use it from time to time to evaluate things for myself, whereas all you are
concerned with is taking it upon trust. I resent your term dishonest, you were
practically forced to produce the basis for your text, some of which i doubt you had
even heard of and here you are lecturing others as to the integrity of their text, its
mockworthy! especially considering your Greek text is a transcript and not a proper
translation.
I have no problem with alternative renderings, but i will not have you bad mouthing
the New world Translation, its hypocrisy for you to sate that we should have a
plethora of other translations and then try to exclude it, and on what basis, that the
translators wish to remain anonymous, and then to cite a transcript as if it were a
God send, you need to feel your bum mate to make sure your not dreaming.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieJohn 1
No Jehovah is God, Jesus is Gods only begotten son, that is as to progeny and to time.
The Deity of Jesus Christ
1(A)In the beginning was (B)the Word, and the Word was (C)with God, and (D)the Word was God.
2He was in the beginning with God.
3(E)All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.
4(F)In Him was life, and the life was (G)the Light of men.
The Word Made Flesh
14And (A)the Word (B)became flesh, and (C)dwelt among us, and (D)we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of (E)grace and (F)truth
Jesus is God, not a god... THE God!
2 edits
Originally posted by Dowardyawn, here we go again, more trinity dogma, ok lets take the first one,
John 1
The Deity of Jesus Christ
1(A)In the beginning was (B)the Word, and the Word was (C)with God, and (D)the Word was God.
2He was in the beginning with God.
3(E)All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.
4(F)In Him was life, and the life was (G)the Light of men.
The Word M ...[text shortened]... tten from the Father, full of (E)grace and (F)truth
Jesus is God, not a god... THE God!
how is it that Christ is with God and God at the same time, please explain, how i am
with my wife and be my wife at the same time, that is after all, what your translation is
saying, is it not?
here it is,
He was in the beginning with God
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHe was in the beginning with God
yawn, here we go again, more trinity dogma, ok lets take the first one,
how is it that Christ is with God and God at the same time, please explain, how i am
with my wife and be my wife at the same time, that is after all, what your translation is
saying, is it not?
here it is,
He was in the beginning with God
and he was God, and the word became flesh. This passage is excedingly clear. It's no wonder the "anonymous" translators of the NWT resorted to changing the wording, it's a fatal blow to their heretical dogma
3 edits
Originally posted by DowardI shall repeat the question, how is it possible to be with someone and to be them at the
[b]He was in the beginning with God
and he was God, and the word became flesh. This passage is excedingly clear. It's no wonder the "anonymous" translators of the NWT resorted to changing the wording, it's a fatal blow to their heretical dogma[/b]
same time, you have not answered the question, merely repeating the assertion is not
an answer, again
how is it possible to be with someone and to be them at the same time.
One small piece of logic and your whole assertion is floundering, its mock worthy!
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobiehubble bubble toil and trouble....
yawn, here we go again, more trinity dogma, ok lets take the first one,
how is it that Christ is with God and God at the same time, please explain, how i am
with my wife and be my wife at the same time, that is after all, what your translation is
saying, is it not?
here it is,
He was in the beginning with God
The projection of my personality on these boards is an alias you know as Agerg, but in real life there is also a Greg; my alias is with me and I am Agerg from your point of view when I'm on these boards tippy typing away but I am also Greg distinct from his computer monitor manifestation Agerg! Same argument could be applied to the trinity I suppose. ;]
3 edits
Originally posted by Agergand who then is the Holy spirit? your printer? your speakers? its not possible to be with
hubble bubble toil and trouble....
The projection of my personality on these boards is an alias you know as Agerg, but in real life there is also a Greg; my alias is with me and I am Agerg from your point of view when I'm on these boards tippy typing away but I am also Greg distinct from his computer monitor manifestation Agerg! Same argument could be applied to the trinity I suppose. ;]
some one and to be them at the same time, as logic clearly demonstrates.
Greg is a Scottish name, i hope you honour its great historicity!