22 Sep '12 17:45>
Originally posted by VoidSpiritThey are idiots. Could I say anything nicer about them? I doubt it.
they have a much better understanding of the bible than the trinitarians.
Originally posted by boononPsalm 22
Hi,
So you choose to view it as a question and not the way I presented it? Just wondering why?
Obviously I suspect that you are an avid student of the scriptures because I have seen many of your posts and you do show knowledge of Gods word.
If you read all of psalm 22 can you not see that I 'may' be correct and it is not a question or do you disagree? If you do disagree could you explain to me why my reasoning is wrong.
Thanks.
Originally posted by RJHindstrinitarian scholars have confessed that the original greek was altered to support the trinity doctrine.
I just quoted 1 Timotyy 3:16 which says, God was manifest in the flesh.
Wake Up! Dunderhead.
NASB
By common confession great is the mystery of godliness: He who was revealed in the flesh, Was vindicated in the Spirit, Beheld by angels, Proclaimed among the nations, Believed on in the world, Taken up in glory”
Originally posted by RJHindsoh, i forgot that your complete ignorance prevents you from being educated. that's okay though, you're an imposter anyways. these discussions will help bring understanding to other readers.
They are idiots. Could I say anything nicer about them? I doubt it.
Originally posted by menace71Praise God yes. Isaiah 53 is beautiful.
Psalm 22
New American Standard Bible (NASB)
A Cry of Anguish and a Song of Praise.
www.biblegateway.com
For the choir director; upon Aijeleth Hashshahar. A Psalm of David.
22 My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?
Far from my deliverance are the words of my groaning.
2 O my God, I cry by day, but You do not answer;
And by night, but I have n ...[text shortened]... l in the sense that it's a prophecy and very descriptive. Sounds a lot like Isaiah 53
Manny
Originally posted by boononIf he didn't say this out loud for all to hear, how did anyone there know he said that? How could the prophecy be fullfilled if no one could hear it and to document it?
Praise God yes. Isaiah 53 is beautiful.
Verse 7 states that 'he was oppressed and afflicted yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth.'
Kind of strange that some people say he was questioning his father when as we just read it is stated that he opened not his mouth. Not stated once in the verse but twice.
God Bless
Boonon
Originally posted by RJHindsTo have true love for another, as Jesus commanded, you must first know of Gods love for you. If you have truly never known His love you can not love someone else.
They are idiots. Could I say anything nicer about them? I doubt it.
Originally posted by boononGive him time and it will get much worse sad to say.
To have true love for another, as Jesus commanded, you must first know of Gods love for you. If you have truly never known His love you can not love someone else.
Just because you cannot agree with someone , doesn't mean you can call them an idiot. Well I guess you can (as you did) but it shows your lack of knowledge or relationship with the living God. ...[text shortened]... defiled by the words that come out of your mouth.” (Matthew 15:11 NLT)
With love,
Boonon
Originally posted by galveston75You miss my point again friend.
If he didn't say this out loud for all to hear, how did anyone there know he said that? How could the prophecy be fullfilled if no one could hear it and to document it?
Originally posted by boononNo I don't remember saying that about David. Must have been someone else. But I took your statement that he did not say out loud what he did say. That's all.
You miss my point again friend.
As I stated he did not open his mouth to question, but to confirm.
David in psalm 22 did not go through everything written in there. (vs 17 and 18). I also believe that earlier you said something like David did not know he had offended God. Was this before or after he was an adulterer and a murder? Jesus was neither.
...[text shortened]... what you believe, I just think you are choosing to not look at the scripture as it is.
Boonon
Originally posted by RJHindsSo, from what I gather from your comments...
Look at were you are getting this crap from - Unitarian website.
The unitarians don't understand the Trinity anymore than the JWs do. Did you notice they said 1/3 rd of the Godhead, meaning they think the Trinity doctrine divides God into parts. This is a false concept of God. God can not be divided into parts. This written only knows a little about w ...[text shortened]... dy to take as an authority on Christian beliefs. Poo Poo.
http://carm.org/what-unitarianism
Originally posted by galveston75In here.
No problem. Here is a question that was written in by a person wanting this clearified for them:
Why, while hanging on the stake, did Jesus Christ cry out, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”—U.S.A.
Jesus’ question was a quotation from a psalm of David. (Ps. 22:1) In David’s case the question related to a momentary condition of abandonme ...[text shortened]...
In fact this was a fulfillment of what Jesus would say when he was confronted with his death.
Originally posted by VoidSpiritYou are believing in Satan"s teachings. I believe in the teachings of the Christ. We shall see who is triumphant when you go to your reward in Hell and I to mine in the paradise of Heaven.
trinitarian scholars have confessed that the original greek was altered to support the trinity doctrine.
the original greek manuscript, the best translation is:
"the mystery of godliness is great, which was manifest in the flesh,"
when properly translated, it actually proves the trinity doctrine false.
[quote]
NASB
By common confession great ...[text shortened]... ng at all about christ being god or there being a trinity.
educate yourself. dunderhead.
Originally posted by boononWhen the prophet Isaiah wrote that the suffering Servant “opened not His mouth” while being oppressed and afflicted (Isaiah 53:7), he did not mean that Jesus never uttered a word from the time He was arrested in the garden until His death on the cross. The thought behind this phrase is that the Jesus would not speak freely and unreservedly in defense of Himself. Whereas Jesus could have responded to His accusers with “an open mouth” and given a strong, lengthy defense of His innocence (similar to how Philip, Peter, and Paul testified of both Christ and their own ministry with “an open mouth&rdquo😉, Jesus chose to restrain Himself before His accusers and tormentors. Rather than calling twelve legions of angels to fight this battle for Him (cf. Matthew 26:53), Jesus humbly submitted to His enemies. Rather than performing some notable miracle before Herod so as to gain His freedom (cf. Luke 23:8), and instead of striking the high priest with blindness in an attempt to convince the Sanhedrin that He truly was the Son of God, Jesus suppressed His powers. Less than twenty-four hours earlier, Jesus had healed Malchus’ severed ear, yet Jesus did nothing to lighten His own affliction during His trial and crucifixion—not even mentioning this miracle so as to defend His deity. In light of what Christ could have done to His accusers and what oral defense He could have given before them on His own behalf, Christ’s passive submission before them is remarkable. Truly, “when He was reviled, did not revile in return; when He suffered, He did not threaten, but committed Himself to Him who judges righteously” (1 Peter 2:23).
Praise God yes. Isaiah 53 is beautiful.
Verse 7 states that 'he was oppressed and afflicted yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he opened not his mouth.'
Kind of strange that some people say he was questioning his father when as we just read it is stated that he opened not his mouth. Not stated once in the verse but twice.
God Bless
Boonon
Originally posted by boononYou apparently have not read what Jesus called the Pharisees.
To have true love for another, as Jesus commanded, you must first know of Gods love for you. If you have truly never known His love you can not love someone else.
Just because you cannot agree with someone , doesn't mean you can call them an idiot. Well I guess you can (as you did) but it shows your lack of knowledge or relationship with the living God. ...[text shortened]... defiled by the words that come out of your mouth.” (Matthew 15:11 NLT)
With love,
Boonon