2 edits
Originally posted by @fmfThat is not logical because one we can’t both be right. One of us has to be wrong. Logically we will either be judged by a supernatural being or we won’t.
This is a subjective perspective. I have no reason to believe that either of us will be "judged" by a supernatural being. My perspective on this is subjective too.
FMF: You said killing the rapist was morally justified. Why?What is your justification for killing the rapist in the circumstances described?
Originally posted by @dj2becker
Why wouldn’t it be?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am OK with you thinking I am wrong.
That is not logical because one we can’t both be right.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIt's OK for me if you think you will.
Logically we will either be judged by a supernatural being or we won’t.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerLike me, you navigate your way through life using a moral compass that helps you assess what you feel is right and wrong and even what is "warped".
That doesn’t mean that their environments have automatically taught them the right thing, their sense of right and wrong could still be warped.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell, it's all subjective, isn't it? So if I think you're wrong, then I think you're wrong. If you disagree, then so be it: we just have to agree to disagree. Law enforcement and the courts will intervene if the 'wrongdoing' is illegal or criminal and goes beyond 'agreeing to disagree'. But as long as it falls short of that, it is your right to fret and speculate about what your god figure thinks and what action he might or might not take against you. If you are convinced that all that god stuff is right, and that I am wrong about it, that's OK. It doesn't affect me.
Do you agree that we can't both be right?
Originally posted by @fmfYou're dodging. Do you agree that logically we can't both be right? Yes or No?
Well, it's all subjective, isn't it? So if I think you're wrong, then I think you're wrong. If you disagree, then so be it: we just have to agree to disagree. Law enforcement and the courts will intervene if the 'wrongdoing' is illegal or criminal and goes beyond 'agreeing to disagree'. But as long as it falls short of that, it is your right to fret and specula ...[text shortened]... that all that god stuff is right, and that I am wrong about it, that's OK. It doesn't affect me.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you believe that this justification is rooted in "absolute truth" and some sort of "authority" that you are endowed with by your religious beliefs?
As the father of two daughters I believe their safety is paramount. If he tried to kill my daughter I would probably kill him first if that was the only way to stop him.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou can believe you are right. And I can believe you are wrong. You can believe you are right. You can believe I am wrong. You can claim you are using "logic"; I can claim I am using "logic". It's subjective.
Do you agree that logically we can't both be right? Yes or No?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerOf course. This is the sort of subjective assessment that our moral compasses allow us to make.
Do you agree that a moral compass can be warped?