- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
2 edits
Originally posted by @fmfIt is quite obvious why you refuse to answer the question: How can anyone be truly wrong about anything if moral relativism is true?
You are talking disingenuous/uncomprehending nonsense. And your question is based on the gimmick that you are pretending that you haven't read anything I have said to you for over two years.
Here's a question for you about an action we agree on: you have revealed that you believe it would be morally justifiable for you to kill a man who had raped your daug ...[text shortened]... e. What "authority" and "absolute truths" do you think back up your moral stance on this matter?
Moral relativism is based upon the assumption that there are no absolute moral truths which means everyone makes up their own moral truth. Within the context of moral absolutism God is the final authority on what is right and wrong. He has instilled within each of us a moral conscience and given us the ability to reason morally.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI have answered this and explained my thinking over and over again. Refer back to that.
It is quite obvious why you refuse to answer the question: How can anyone be truly wrong about anything if moral relativism is true?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou claim to use your superstitious notions as a basis for your moral compass and unilaterally declare this to be a set of "absolute moral truths" based on a "final authority" and you call your various personal feelings, opinions and preferences "absolutism". This is all just about as subjective as you could possibly get.
Moral relativism is based upon the assumption that there are no absolute moral truths which means everyone makes up their own moral truth. Within the context of moral absolutism God is the final authority on what is right and wrong. He has instilled within each of us a moral conscience and given us the ability to reason morally.
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerFrom the previous page: Here's a question for you about an action we agree on: you have revealed that you believe it would be morally justifiable for you to kill a man who had raped your daughter if you believed that he was about to make good on his promise to kill your daughter in retaliation for telling people what he'd done.
If you believe that those who disagree with you are wrong in their assessment you cannot be a moral relativist. How can anyone be wrong about anything if moral relativism is true?
What "final authority" and "absolute moral truths" do you think back up your moral stance on this matter?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you think - intellectually speaking and interpersonally speaking [in so far as these things are demonstrated on this forum] - that you have recovered from those 20+ years of brainwashing? I don't.
You have no idea what kind of brainwashing occurred at the place...
Originally posted by @badradgerWeren't you in prison?
everyone gets brainwashed, I came from a devoutly non religious family only went to church for weddings and funerals, my wife on the other hand is a fully paid up member of the RC godsquad , how we made this marriage work for 45 years is beyond me.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeyes I served 5 years in holme house for breaking and entering,recieving stolen goods , pimping , and supplying drugs to minors, but apart from that I am a really nice guy.
Weren't you in prison?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmf"If morality really is relative it cannot be objectively wrong for anyone to do as they see fit."
You are talking disingenuous/uncomprehending nonsense. And your question is based on the gimmick that you are pretending that you haven't read anything I have said to you for over two years.
Here's a question for you about an action we agree on: you have revealed that you believe it would be morally justifiable for you to kill a man who had raped your daug ...[text shortened]... e. What "authority" and "absolute truths" do you think back up your moral stance on this matter?
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI've addressed your use of the word "objectively" before over and over again and in great detail. Refer back to that.
If morality really is relative it cannot be objectively wrong for anyone to do as they see fit.