Originally posted by KellyJaySure thing.
I actually did that, saw that link, but I didn't think he'd accept it.
I have not taken the time to try and run down links that were not
from that site. Personally, I actually don't think I'll find any, mainly
because to say some of these were actual evidence would right
away call into question the person making the claim, because anyone
who suggests i ...[text shortened]... ny
credibility, to say anything else is to be against science in the eyes of
some.
Kelly
These miserable atheists have set a whole machinery, a real plot, the ultimate concpirancy big time in order to deny by any means the Humanity the real, pure knowledge, which is that the Human and the Dinos were together side by side in that arc😵
Originally posted by KellyJayWhy is that do you think? Is it the work of the Devil? Who is deceiving us all? Or is it just bad luck that we are so mistaken?
I actually did that, saw that link, but I didn't think he'd accept it.
I have not taken the time to try and run down links that were not
from that site. Personally, I actually don't think I'll find any, mainly
because to say some of these were actual evidence would right
away call into question the person making the claim, because anyone
who suggests i ...[text shortened]... ny
credibility, to say anything else is to be against science in the eyes of
some.
Kelly
1 edit
Originally posted by FabianFnasBut aren't you just a little curious how ancient cultures came to depict
If a website is well done is not a sigh [sic] that its content is true, is it? You know that. Many nazi pages are very nicely designed, but its truth value is very low. Like this one.
I have taken some time to evaluate it, but I don't see anything about fossils.
animals that closely resemble what we now know some dinosaurs would
have looked like? Or are you questioning the validity of the artifacts and
paintings in that article all together? *
I find it remarkable that if these depictions and sculptures are genuine,
people back then created such dinosaur-like art. Even more remarkable
would it be if they'd actually seen dinosaurs. Makes me mind boggle!
Also, can't you understand that if someone believes in creationism and
God, that these "evidence" would pack some weight to the point of truly
believing in their authenticity? If you were one day proven wrong about
something others kept telling you were wrong, would it be fair of the rest
of us to call you a liar to your face?
* Yeah, the site doesn't pack a lot of credibility, does it? 😕
http://www.genesispark.com/genpark/bell/bell.htm
1 edit
Originally posted by JigtieSome of the animals depicted is dromedars, giraffs, kangurus, fairytale dragons, and some pictures that you can identify with animals only with great imagination. He is a fraud.
But aren't you just a little curious how ancient cultures came to depict
animals that closely resemble what we now know some dinosaurs would
have looked like? Or are you questioning the validity of the artifacts and
paintings in that article all together? *
I find it remarkable that if these depictions and sculptures are genuine,
people back then c pack a lot of credibility, does it? 😕
http://www.genesispark.com/genpark/bell/bell.htm
But what if the picutes were real? The question is still there why no fossils are found from dinosaurs from historic times? There would be plenty of them, wouldn't it? We can easily find 65+ million of year old fossils, but no fossils younger than 50 thousand of years, anywhere. Funny, isn't it?
No, this evidence is not credible. Young Earth Creationists are not credible. But they do have a great imagination.
Originally posted by FabianFnasuntruthful does not equal "in error"
KellyJay has promised to show evidence of that dinosaurs lived side by side with humans. He is too stubborn to admit that this is pure fantasies that KellyJay believe in.
Is it okay to be untruthful when you are christian?
Are there more christians who share KellyJays belifs, or is he unique? If so, why isn't there any other christians who defend him ...[text shortened]... art of science, therefore I want to discuss this religious matter her in the Spiritual Forum.
Originally posted by PinkFloydHe may have so wrong as he wants. We have freedom of religion in most western countries, haven't we? But when we say that we will provide evidence and not do it, not even want to do it, then we are not 'in error', we are 'untruthful'. And you know what individual I mean with 'we'. (KellyJay is a bit sensitive to critics, so I don't mention his name.)
untruthful does not equal "in error"
Originally posted by Jigtieis a child drawing dragons proof that there are dragons?
But aren't you just a little curious how ancient cultures came to depict
animals that closely resemble what we now know some dinosaurs would
have looked like? Or are you questioning the validity of the artifacts and
paintings in that article all together? *
I find it remarkable that if these depictions and sculptures are genuine,
people back then c ...[text shortened]... pack a lot of credibility, does it? 😕
http://www.genesispark.com/genpark/bell/bell.htm
Originally posted by FabianFnasyou just mentioned his name
He may have so wrong as he wants. We have freedom of religion in most western countries, haven't we? But when we say that we will provide evidence and not do it, not even want to do it, then we are not 'in error', we are 'untruthful'. And you know what individual I mean with 'we'. (KellyJay is a bit sensitive to critics, so I don't mention his name.)
Originally posted by ZahlanziFail. The drawing of a dragon doesn't prove in any way that there was or
is a child drawing dragons proof that there are dragons?
there is dragons. It could for all we know be the figment of a child's
imagination. But if we later find fossils of dragons that we can determine
would have looked very much like that drawing of a dragon, the question
is not entirely unfounded: "How could the drawing come to be so similar
to an actual animal though no such animals should have existed at the
time of the drawing?"
The answer could be one of many, so it wouldn't necessarily conclude
that dragons lived at the time the child made that drawing, but it's still
not an entirely unfounded question.
Seeing as the sculptures and drawings in that link HoH posted is
apparently fraud or a far stretch of the imagination, the question is
purely hypothetical, of course.
Originally posted by FabianFnasI would agree, that if the pictures were authentic, it would be "funny"
But what if the picutes were real? The question is still there why no fossils are found from dinosaurs from historic times? There would be plenty of them, wouldn't it? We can easily find 65+ million of year old fossils, but no fossils younger than 50 thousand of years, anywhere. Funny, isn't it?
that humans (some sixty five million years after the extinction of such
animals) manage to depict them to a scale level similarity. And it being so
"funny" would pose the question: "How on earth could these people have
done that?", no rock imprints set aside.