Go back
Lets get this straight.

Lets get this straight.

Spirituality

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Badwater
My bad; you are correct, of course. Next time I mean tunnel vision I need to say so! I'm not a doctor, so I'm bound to screw up medical jargon.

My sincere apologies.
until our next rendezvous, then 🙂

*btw* my original comment was supposed to be a compliment

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Just keep talking. No wonder you had the crap kicked out of you.
Now is that the Christlike approach ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by WWindmill
Somebody owes me an apology first.
Okay. I'll apologise for knocking the wind out of your sails when you apologise to pritybetta for your course and rude remarks.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Okay. I'll apologise for knocking the wind out of your sails when you apologise to pritybetta for your course and rude remarks.
OK ... consider it done. Everybody kiss and make up. Leave me out ot it.

Now PB has a verse to find for me ... Im waiting!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Rajk999
Now is that the Christlike approach ?
As I've said before, I ain't nicer than Jesus.

Maybe there wouldn't be so much crime against women and children if men would defend them instead of being predators and perpetrators.

Who's side are you on?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Okay. I'll apologise for knocking the wind out of your sails when you apologise to pritybetta for your course and rude remarks.
LOL.. You knocked nothing out of my sails. Maybe you are just blinded like your lust and need a good boom boom to make you see straight.

Vote Up
Vote Down

To Joseph the forgiver..

Yes it has. Science has proved extensive flooding from a long time ago but none of a wwflood which would EASILY be found. Science has proved that there isnt enough water to create a wwflood. Science has proved that it is an impossibility for that many animals to evlove in such a short space of time(the only way all animals could fit onto the ark). Science has proved that fresh water fish cannot survive in salt water. etc.. etc.. etc.. on and on and on!

Are you going to read this and make a comment?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
As I've said before, I ain't nicer than Jesus.

Maybe there wouldn't be so much crime against women and children if men would defend them instead of being predators and perpetrators.

Who's side are you on?
There is nothing to defend. Get a grip.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
As I've said before, I ain't nicer than Jesus.

Maybe there wouldn't be so much crime against women and children if men would defend them instead of being predators and perpetrators.

Who's side are you on?
Now I am a predator?

Vote Up
Vote Down

I give it to women and I dont have a problem with it. They should learn to treat others with respect at the same time. What you think women hold a higher standing then a man?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
As I've said before, I ain't nicer than Santa.
🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Im giving it to a women right now.

&&

Vote Up
Vote Down

Reading this thread and several other threads in the spirituality forum, I can't help wondering what ever happened to the beautiful principle that says "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend with my life your right to say it".
Does anyone here seriously give a cuss what anyone else believes about the flood, or any other topic that has been thrown into the ring? Are we setting out to try building the tower of Babel again? It almost reads like a bunch of people all saying "Well I hold this particular opinion, as I am entitled to do, but how dare you have a different view of it?"
I don't suggest that I am immune to this malaise, I tend to jump in as quickly as most folk, and try to ram my opinion down the throats of strangers, but I wonder why we have problems accepting the fact that any person's viewpoint is valid in the eyes of that person.
Do we really need to subject people to trial by insult and innuendo? Is mankind ultimately headed towards abject solipsism?
When two people argue over a matter on which they both know they will never agree, perhaps they are both wrong, for wasting their time doing it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

To Joseph the ignorant..

Yes it has. Science has proved extensive flooding from a long time ago but none of a wwflood which would EASILY be found. Science has proved that there isnt enough water to create a wwflood. Science has proved that it is an impossibility for that many animals to evlove in such a short space of time(the only way all animals could fit onto the ark). Science has proved that fresh water fish cannot survive in salt water. etc.. etc.. etc.. on and on and on!

Are you going to read this and make a comment or would you prefer to continue your sexual abuse claims and hunt me as a predator so your nonsense belief of a wwflood will continue to make sense to you?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by WWindmill
To Joseph the ignorant..

Yes it has. Science has proved extensive flooding from a long time ago but none of a wwflood which would EASILY be found. Science has proved that there isnt enough water to create a wwflood. Science has proved that it is an impossibility for that many animals to evlove in such a short space of time(the only way all animals coul ...[text shortened]... d hunt me as a predator so your nonsense belief of a wwflood will continue to make sense to you?
An old chinese proverb (that I just made up):

"What Joseph doesn't want to answer, Joseph doesn't answer at all."