Originally posted by RJHinds
The other Bible version do not say any thing about "Jehovah" in them. Do they?
P.S. When the Gentiles heard this - Heard that the gospel was to be preached to them. The doctrine of the Jews had been that salvation was confined to themselves. The Gentiles rejoiced that from the mouths of Jews themselves they now heard a different doctrine.
When the Gentiles heard this - Heard that the gospel was to be preached to them. The doctrine of the Jews had been that salvation was confined to themselves. The Gentiles rejoiced that from the mouths of Jews themselves they now heard a different doctrine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars
I know you like a good lnk and read it carefully because you said so.
The Jews actively proselytized from about the second Century BC and had converts throughout the Mediterranean at the time of the Roman Empire. It was the Christians who, once they established their power in the later empire, enforced on the Jews a commitment to stop proselytizing and in time this was politically essential for their survival under conditions of dire oppression at the hands of Christians, though conversion and intermarriage never ceased completely.
Perhaps the largest conversion, however was the Khazars between the 8th and 10th centuries. I quote from the link:
After fighting the Arabs to a standstill in the North Caucasus, Khazars became increasingly interested in replacing their Tengriism with a state religion that would give them equal religious standing with their Abrahamic neighbors. During the 8th century, the Khazar royalty and much of the aristocracy converted to a form of Judaism.[17] Yitzhak ha-Sangari is the name of the rabbi who converted the Khazars to Judaism according to Jewish sources.
Khazars were judged according to Tora (orders of the Khagan; coming from the root Tora meaning customs; unwritten law of people in Old Turkic) (Modern Turkish: Töre), while the other tribes were judged according to their own laws.[14]
Being a surprisingly tolerant and pluralistic society, even its army incorporated Jews, Christians, Muslims and Pagans at a time when religious warfare was the order of the day around the Mediterranean and in Western Europe. By welcoming educated and worldly Jews from both Christian Europe and the Islamic Middle East, Khazars rapidly absorbed many of the arts and technologies of civilization. As a direct result of this cultural infusion, they became one of the very few Asian steppe tribal societies that successfully made the transition from nomad to urbanite. Settling in their newly created towns and cities between the Caspian Sea and the Crimean Peninsula on the Black Sea, they became literate and multi-lingual agriculturalists, manufacturers and international traders.[19]
Between 965 and 969, Khazar sovereignty was broken by Kievan Rus. Sviatoslav I of Kiev defeated them in 965 by conquering the Khazar fortress of Sarkel. Two years later, Sviatoslav conquered Atil, after which he campaigned in the Balkans.
The false information on which you rely (
and it is interesting to demonstrate a direct, intentional falsehood in Christian scriptures) is also a component of the modern invention of political Zionism and the so called "right of return" for Jews around the world to join in the Jewish settlement of Palestinian land. The notion that modern Jews are the direct descendents of the Jewish population of Palestine is a travesty and a nonsense. The people best able to claim that direct descent from the Jews of ancient times are the Palestinians and today they are largely of the muslim faith. If anything, the Jews of Russia and Eastern Europe are more likely to be descended from the Khazars, while others are descended (if not from more recent converts) from the many converts around the Roman Empire. This is why, for example, there is no genetic test capable of identifying a Jew, and no other biological test either, to the frustration of Zionist extremists and of course, especially in the past hundred years, to other racists.