21 May '14 19:10>
Originally posted by SuzianneI know you agree with me. [on this limited point 😉 ]
If you have read anything I write here, you'd see that I happen to agree with you.
"God did it" is more than obvious, but it doesn't explain anything. We need to see *how* He "did it". Science neatly answers this.
I was just pointing out that RJHinds would have absolutely no trouble
'answering' your question.
Because he allows 'god did it' as a 'valid' explanation he isn't troubled
by anything you throw at him.
However you have a similar problem.
Because you allow 'Faith' [and you know what I mean by that word] as
a 'valid' reason for believing things, you can justify believing ANYTHING
based entirely on what feels right for you. The boundaries that you happen
to draw are purely arbitrary, as demonstrated by the very different boundaries
drawn by different faith based believers. And the total lack of rational and/or
coherent reasons for their [the boundaries] location.