Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell, it's not a social construct. With a false premise the argument fails.
If the monogamous institution is a social construct that we have created that is not innate to our true selves, what is wrong with polygamy?
Besides, isn't one dipstick husband enough for a woman? Why would she want two or more ego stricken testosterone laden Neanderthal knuckle dragging flee bitten harry assed morons hanging around wrecking the house?
1 edit
Originally posted by @josephwSo she can spend more money?
Well, it's not a social construct. With a false premise the argument fails.
Besides, isn't one dipstick husband enough for a woman? Why would she want two or more ego stricken testosterone laden Neanderthal knuckle dragging flee bitten harry assed morons hanging around wrecking the house?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @josephwMost non religious people believe it is, so I'm trying to understand it from their perspective.
Well, it's not a social construct. With a false premise the argument fails.
Besides, isn't one dipstick husband enough for a woman? Why would she want two or more ego stricken testosterone laden Neanderthal knuckle dragging flee bitten harry assed morons hanging around wrecking the house?
Originally posted by @josephwDunno ... maybe your wife can help answering that one 😀
Well, it's not a social construct. With a false premise the argument fails.
Besides, isn't one dipstick husband enough for a woman? Why would she want two or more ego stricken testosterone laden Neanderthal knuckle dragging flee bitten harry assed morons hanging around wrecking the house?
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell the state does not allow polygamists to marry cuz it's yucky. Therefore, it must be bad
If the monogamous institution is a social construct that we have created that is not innate to our true selves, what is wrong with polygamy?
Gay marriage, though, is "A" OK. 😵