4 edits
-Removed-I dont think the website needs mods like FMF, I alerted a post and was answered instantly by a very considerate mod. On chess.com fopr example there are ludicrous mods that get called out all the time for their stupidity and lack of judgement. I would make a better mod than the FMF.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd picking between those two evils is something no one should have to do.
I dont think the website needs mods like FMF, I alerted a post and was answered instantly by a very considerate mod. On chess.com fopr example there are ludicrous mods that get called out all the time for their stupidity and lack of judgement. I would make a better mod than the FMF.
1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneThose tin hat despots on chess dot com and FMF? I agree, two evils no one should be made to choose between! Vote for Robbie, he has the right qualities to mod even Russ.
And picking between those two evils is something no one should have to do.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo, I said choosing between you and FMF. You both never miss an opportunity to clutter this forum with the "FMF and Robbie" show. Lots of otherwise interesting threads have been derailed into oblivion because of you two. Neither of you have learned how to act in a public forum and yet you both aspire to control those forums. Now that's some spectacular fail waiting to happen.
Those tin hat despots on chess dot com and FMF? I agree, two evils no one should be made to choose between! Vote for Robbie, he has the right qualities to mod even Russ.
Originally posted by SuzianneI'd mod like a Boss.
No, I said choosing between you and FMF. You both never miss an opportunity to clutter this forum with the "FMF and Robbie" show. Lots of otherwise interesting threads have been derailed into oblivion because of you two. Neither of you have learned how to act in a public forum and yet you both aspire to control those forums. Now that's some spectacular fail waiting to happen.