Originally posted by SuzianneIt's amusing that you think FMF, who is probably one of the most intellectually tenacious, topically direct and inflinchingly forthright posters on the site, needs to hide behind the anonymity of a moderators postion in order to satisfy a "chomping" need for payback.
Actually, I think he's showing confidence in Russ that he won't elevate to Mod status someone who is just 'chomping at the bit' to finally give out some unanswerable 'payback'.
10 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour revelation in the other thread that you would not allow me into your clan for personal reasons is exactly why you would make a poor moderator.
I'd mod like a Boss.
As it is your cognition is informed from a pinhole perspective which is frequently clouded by your stubbornness and anger and your posting is peppered with invective language and peronal abuse.
10 Oct 15
Originally posted by divegeesterI wont let you in my clan because I don't need another 900-1000 rated player. Your insistence that this disqualifies me as a moderator is ludicrous.
Your revelation in the other thread that you would not allow me into your clan for personal reasons is exactly why you would make a poor moderator.
As it is your cognition is informed from a pinhole perspective which is frequently clouded by your stubbornness and anger and your posting is peppered with invective language and peronal abuse.
10 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieyou've introduced this rating angle as a deflection since you realised that you were making it personal by saying you would not let me in because you like to give me a hard time in the forums and if I was I your clan you would have to be nice to me.
I wont let you in my clan because I don't need another 900-1000 rated player. Your insistence that this disqualifies me as a moderator is ludicrous.
10 Oct 15
Originally posted by divegeesterOn the contrary the fact is I don't need another 900-1000 rated player, you can accept the fact of cry about it, either way you are still not getting in. Maybe FMF will come along and kiss you better?
you've introduced this rating angle as a deflection since you realised that you were making it personal by saying you would not let me in because you like to give me a hard time in the forums and if I was I your clan you would have to be nice to me.
10 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy did you say earlier that you would not let me in because it was "a conflict of interest"?
On the contrary the fact is I don't need another 900-1000 rated player, you can accept the fact of cry about it, either way you are still not getting in. Maybe FMF will come along and kiss you better?
11 Oct 15
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFYou were asked for proof of a cover up, you could provided nothing, no not a single iota to substantiate your ludicrous claim and we are once again left with the prospect that you must simply have made it up or have once again been caught engaging in idle gossip like 'The real housewives of RHP', that you and your friend evidently purport to be. No amount of references to previous threads, statements made etc could help you provide that evidence. My private corespondent was correct you really are quite empty and simply a waste of time.
I await his 'reflections' on child sacrifice and covering up child sex abuse.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour argument in favour of covering up of child sex abuse in your religious organisation is here: Thread 162947.
You were asked for proof of a cover up..
11 Oct 15
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFPlease provide evidence of a cover up. You attempted the same thing in the general forum and could not provide a shred of evidence there and as its a very serious allegation either produce evidence of a cover up or you will be reported to the moderators.
Your argument arguing for the covering up of child sex abuse in your religious organisation is here: Thread 162947.
11 Oct 15
Originally posted by FMFYour post has been reported to the site moderation. This is the third time that you have made this serious allegation without a shred of substantiating evidence.
Your argument in favour of covering up of child sex abuse in your religious organisation is here: Thread 162947.
11 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo one is accusing you of having covered up child sex abuse. You are being confronted with the fact you have argued publicly in favour of covering up child sex abuse in your religious organisation.
Please provide evidence of a cover up. You attempted the same thing in the general forum and could not provide a shred of evidence there and as its a very serious allegation either produce of a cover up or you will be reported to the moderators.
11 Oct 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat you argued the merits of covering up child sex abuse on that thread I linked to is not in dispute is it? Do you dispute it?
Your post has been reported to the site moderation. This is the third time that you have made this serious allegation without a shred of substantiating evidence.