@kellyjay said
It is a simple question do you think it a natural thing for a unguided mindless goalless process to make a functionally systematic life with error checking? This nature at work or is it unnatural because everything moves to equilibrium by nature?
You don’t acknowledge life has in it instructions guiding all the functions in it?
The answer to your entire (first) question is 'no', because, as I have said before, there is no 'error checking'.
Your use of the word 'error' is in the first place erroneous, since it implies that nature is doing something 'wrong', and nature does nothing 'wrong' in any moral or conscious sense. Imperfect genetic copying often occurs from one generation to the next, as is self - evident, (so no error checking, then) which is a factor in the process of evolution.
Your second question is some kind of double - speak and makes no sense, since nature is by its' definition natural, it can be nothing else.
Once again, your use of the word 'instructions' is inappropriate, since it implies that an external force or intellect is giving 'instruction' to 'life', which it isn't. Nothing is being 'guided' by anything else.
So, here's one for you; how old do you believe the earth to be? It's a question which you conveniently ignore, or say that you don't care about, but I'm asking you once again to answer it.