No Middle Ground

Originally posted by twhitehead
Huh? Your making no sense.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." I Cor 1:18

-Removed-

Transitive infinitive verbs 'to accept or to reject' apply universally to the volition of mankind. Doubt plays a role. It buys time.

Originally posted by shavixmir
Not neccesarily, you know.
There is a chance that something was lost in translation.

Shavixmir is either who and what he claims to be or he's one of the worst frauds and imposters the RHP Global

Village has ever known. No free spirit poser would make such outrageous claims. Any significant difference?

.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Come on, your not that dense.

Seeking converts to the RHP Spirituality Forum Majority?

😉

Originally posted by googlefudge
This is evidently false, and is such in many different ways.

First we have the logical fallacy of the 'false dichotomy',
There are more options that JC being who he was claimed to be or a fraud.
Other options have already been suggested in this thread, including the fact that he may never
have existed, or did exist but had his words and actions co ...[text shortened]... wrong.

Thus your OP is both logically and materially false.


Oh, and Happy 2012 :-)

You're a good sport, gf... and thanks for weighing in with our daily dose of anticipated fluff whether we wanted it or not.

.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
... must have taken ...

Make your New Year's Resolution to begin using the correct grammar.

Does that really bother you? You sound like one of my grade school
teachers and Judge Judy. 😉

Originally posted by googlefudge
This is evidently false, and is such in many different ways.

First we have the logical fallacy of the 'false dichotomy',
There are more options that JC being who he was claimed to be or a fraud.
Other options have already been suggested in this thread, including the fact that he may never
have existed, or did exist but had his words and actions co ...[text shortened]... wrong.

Thus your OP is both logically and materially false.


Oh, and Happy 2012 :-)

Yeah, maybe he drank too much old wine or smoked some weed that day,
Right? 😉

Originally posted by FMF
Yes, that's on my profile page but what does "The Grateful Dead" have to do with anything we are discussing here?

It happens to be a pre-oocupation you care about with immense passion. As such it may serve to set the tone and bar for the thread by suggesting trivial, frivolous, knee-jerk defensive reactions be excluded in favor of a few, serious and thoughtful responses.

.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
It happens to be a pre-oocupation you care about with immense passion. As such it may serve to set the tone and bar for the thread by suggesting trivial, frivolous, knee-jerk defensive reactions be excluded in favor of a few, serious and thoughtful responses.

.

Are you suggesting he should be born again?

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
It happens to be a pre-oocupation you care about with immense passion. As such it may serve to set the tone and bar for the thread by suggesting trivial, frivolous, knee-jerk defensive reactions be excluded in favor of a few, serious and thoughtful responses.

.

Maybe it would help if you identify the responses in this thread that are serious and thoughtful.

Originally posted by JS357
Maybe it would help if you identify the responses in this thread that are serious and thoughtful.

I'm unable to give an accounting for anyone's but my own. Though mine may be less than eloquent,

I do my level best with each post to think through the issues and give an honest and candid reply.

.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
I'm unable to give an accounting for anyone's but my own. Though mine may be less than eloquent,

I do my level best with each post to think through the issues and give an honest and candid reply.

.

You seemed quite capable of giving a dismissive accounting of the responses of FMF and myself, but you are unable to identify a response that might have been serious and thoughtful; two criteria you seem, nonetheless, to be applying. Does this mean there are no responses you deem to be serious and thoughtful?

Originally posted by JS357
You seemed quite capable of giving a dismissive accounting of the responses of FMF and myself, but you are unable to identify a response that might have been serious and thoughtful; two criteria you seem, nonetheless, to be applying. Does this mean there are no responses you deem to be serious and thoughtful?

Sorry you seem to deem the topic unworthy and/or yours truly unreasonable. Before you give me over to a reprobate

mind, please clarify the mechanics of devolving your status from that of a Believer in Christ to becoming unsaved.

Thank you.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Sorry you seem to deem the topic unworthy and/or yours truly unreasonable. Before you give me over to a reprobate

mind, please clarify the mechanics of devolving your status from that of a Believer in Christ to becoming unsaved.

Thank you.

You're judging me as unsaved? That makes you the one judging me to have a reprobate mind.

http://tbmonline.forum-phpbb.in/t48-reprobate-mind

I will not waste our time on my biography. Use your imagination. I am sure it will envision no possibility of a middle ground between 'Believer in Christ' and 'unsaved.'