02 Jan '12 18:05>1 edit
Originally posted by geariesWhy would non-believers struggle with that? What grade level of non-Christian are you talking with? The psychology of oppressed groups appears, in example after example, to lead to solidarity. From the ineffectiveness of the Dresden bombing, to the ultimate triumph of Christianity via Constantine's use of it to his own ends, there are obvious ways that the oppressed react to oppression. One method involves the evolution of a mythology that supports the worthiness and superiority of the group. Selling Aryan supremacy to the German people inured them to attacks. Of course this does not always work; the Christian Cathars are evidence of that, as an example of Christians oppressed by Christians.
I always find non believers struggle with the following;
The position of the followers of Christ.
They somehow managed to find the courage to carry on the mission of the Lord knowing full well the likely fate they would suffer at the hands of the Romans etc. Would not the easy option be to abandon the whole thing rather than face a similar punishme ...[text shortened]... ctly did they carry on professing the message of our Lord unless they had seen the risen Christ?
"The crusader army came under the command, both spiritually and militarily, of the papal legate Arnaud-Amaury, Abbot of Cîteaux. In the first significant engagement of the war, the town of Béziers was besieged on 22 July 1209. The Catholic inhabitants of the city were granted the freedom to leave unharmed, but many refused and opted to stay and fight alongside the Cathars.
The Cathars spent much of 1209 fending off the crusaders. The leader of the crusaders, Simon de Montfort, resorted to primitive psychological warfare. He ordered his troops to gouge out the eyes of 100 prisoners, cut off their noses and lips, then send them back to the towers led by a prisoner with one remaining eye. This only served to harden the resolve of the Cathars.[21]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharism#Massacre
It is reasonable to think that if the Cathars had won and went on to dominate, we would be believers in its divine providence today. In fact, as a precurser to Martin Luther and other Protestants, it can be said to have survived quite well.
The victory of Christianity within the Roman Empire was ambivalent as to whether the Western or Eastern variety was favored by Constantine. It was touch and go for a while.
But in any case, whichever religion comes to dominate will regard its solidarity and eventual victory as evidence of its proper place and the divine righteousness of its cause. That is just simple psychology. It even works on the football field. There will always be winners and losers, and the winners will Te-bow. 🙂