Originally posted by sasquatch672
Tell you what...I was raised Irish Catholic and I can't tell you the last time I've been to church. I have real problems with organized religion. But I too consider myself to be a very spiritual person, and my argument for the exis ...[text shortened]... pens when the bus comes? It's the greatest adventure of all!
Hi Sasquatch,
Your first argument has what strike me as at least two fatal flaws. First, even if the amount of stuff making up the universe is constant, it doesn't mean the amount of stuff making up you is constant. For example, there is more material stuff to you know than when you were a baby. Second, even if the stuff that is you is constant, and stays around forever, it's arrangement will change, and its the arrangement that is crucial to defining who you are. If I, for example, rearranged all your atoms by chopping you up into bite-sized pieces, the "you" that people knew, or the "you" with whom you are now subjectively acquainted, would have a hard time surviving the process.
Your second argument is also flawed. First, the law of thermodynamics only applies to the universe as it exists, and so is mute on the topic of where this universe came from before it existed; hence, the first law of thermodymanics cannot pertain to an hypothesis about where the universe came from. Second, a created entity only needs a creator if it has been created. You beg the question by assuming that the universe must have been created. But you have actually given no valid argument as to why the universe must have been created. I agree its existence is very weird, but is its weirdness enough to postulate God the Creator?
(Also, God could have created the creator of the universe, so the creator of the universe need not necessarily be your God).
Even if your arguments are invalid, though, I like the fact that you believe in God!