26 Dec '09 16:39>
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneThis belief is not based on the teachings of Jesus.
Fallen man can never hope to attain the righteousness of God
This belief is not based on the teachings of Jesus. Rather it is based on the teachings of others trying to understand what Jesus taught. What's more, it is the antithesis of what Jesus taught. As such, Jesus is your "Lord" in name only. You do not follow Him.
God has made His righ ...[text shortened]... choose to follow the teachings of Jesus. You can choose to truly make Jesus your LORD.
I must have missed the part in any of the Gospels wherein He told His followers to 'try a little harder, they were almost there.'
Rather it is based on the teachings of others trying to understand what Jesus taught. What's more, it is the antithesis of what Jesus taught. As such, Jesus is your "Lord" in name only. You do not follow Him.
Between me and Paul, I'll take what Paul had to say on the subject. Anytime.
As far as it being "the antithesis" of what was taught, that would mean there is some passage somewhere within the Gospels that has Him telling His followers to keep plugging away. I am confident such a passage doesn't exist. That only leaves the possibility that you would have to take existing passages and misconstrue their meaning. Misconstruing their meanings would then render the rest of the Scripture null, void, meaningless.
Again, between me (or you) and Paul's take on the spiritual life, I'll stick with him.
Jesus may be YOUR "righteousness", but as I showed earlier, you cannot reasonably believe Jesus was righteous.
Well, you certainly said it earlier. By no means did you show it.
You can continue to delude yourself or choose to follow the teachings of Jesus. You can choose to truly make Jesus your LORD.
I cannot possibly hope to make Him Lord: He is Lord, whether or not I do anything about it.
Your statements show an underlying problem that will continue to plague any of our conversations. You are under the false impression that a superficial (no insult intended here) reading of the Gospels can lead to an understanding of the messages therein. The Gospels are among the hardest portions of all of Scripture to comprehend, requiring thousands of hours of legwork by a qualified pastor/teacher.
Joe Sixpack isn't going to pick the Bible up, start thumbing through the four books (although a case could almost be made for adding Acts) and figure he's got a good handle on it. Acting out on the understanding that an unsophisticated (read: lacking a systematic structure) reading lends will land the one so armed in a nut house.
Example: since you first read Mark 9:47, have your eyes led you into sin? If so, you haven't plucked it out, have you? Since not, can you consider yourself a 'follower of Jesus?' Do you hate your parents? Cast out demons? Move mountains?
I could go on and on, but (hopefully) the point is made. Namely, the Gospels aren't as seemingly straightforward as one might consider given their simplicity otherwise. God has a system in mind, and to that end, He established the letters written by Paul, established the pastor/teacher dissemination of doctrine, the orderly function of His Church. That it isn't being followed in full does not eliminate its existence.