NZ gay marriage act

Originally posted by wolfgang59
So what?
I thought the latest was that events in the womb are much more likely to cause
various gender and orientation differences.

Regardless of the cause I still cannot get over your panic, you can use all your
arguments against condoning gay marriage within the JWs, but quite frankly
what goes on outside has nothing to do with your silly book a ...[text shortened]... ws.

btw: ANZAC Day here in NZ ... I would like to think freedoms are worth celebrating today.

freedoms? you equate gay marriage with freedoms? freedom from what per se? You think marriage sanctifies homosexual practice? you think it makes the practice any more legitimate? One would like to mock such pretentiousnesses but given a secular liberals sensitivity to what is politically fashionable and lets be clear, what we have is a bunch of fashion victims, I'll refrain, but sure have your gay parade, ignore facts like HIV+ being at its highest levels among homosexuals like since evah! You frame your morality with a decree, give it a semblance of legitimacy, it will never be considered as anything other than an anomaly and contrary to nature.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what has happened in Spanish football, i have been watching the IPL? I dont stress about it, as i have mentioned, they will reap what they sow.

They will reap what they sow? What will they reap exactly?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
freedoms? you equate gay marriage with freedoms? freedom from what per se? You think marriage sanctifies homosexual practice? you think it makes the practice any more legitimate? One would like to mock such pretentiousnesses but given a secular liberals sensitivity to what is politically fashionable and lets be clear, what we have is a bunch of ...[text shortened]... gitimacy, it will never be considered as anything other than an anomaly and contrary to nature.

It will never be considered as anything other than anomaly and contrary to nature by religious fundamentalists like yourself.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
freedoms? you equate gay marriage with freedoms? freedom from what per se? You think marriage sanctifies homosexual practice? you think it makes the practice any more legitimate? One would like to mock such pretentiousnesses but given a secular liberals sensitivity to what is politically fashionable and lets be clear, what we have is a bunch of ...[text shortened]... gitimacy, it will never be considered as anything other than an anomaly and contrary to nature.

I'll refrain, but sure have your gay parade, ignore facts like HIV+ being at its highest levels among homosexuals like since evah


i see you are trundling this old illogical crap out again. do you think hetrosexuals in africa in areas of high levels of h.i.v. should stop being hetrosexual? or is only homosexuals that need to avoid getting std's?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
freedoms? you equate gay marriage with freedoms? freedom from what per se? You think marriage sanctifies homosexual practice? you think it makes the practice any more legitimate? One would like to mock such pretentiousnesses but given a secular liberals sensitivity to what is politically fashionable and lets be clear, what we have is a bunch of ...[text shortened]... gitimacy, it will never be considered as anything other than an anomaly and contrary to nature.

Well, you finally gave us a look at your own self outside the biblical bullshyte. Your words speak for themselves.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
They will reap what they sow? What will they reap exactly?

Gods wrath!

Originally posted by Proper Knob
It will never be considered as anything other than anomaly and contrary to nature by religious fundamentalists like yourself.

or political fashion victims like you and these other materialists.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Gods wrath!

why is he so angry? where does this anger come from?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
[b]I'll refrain, but sure have your gay parade, ignore facts like HIV+ being at its highest levels among homosexuals like since evah


i see you are trundling this old illogical crap out again. do you think hetrosexuals in africa in areas of high levels of h.i.v. should stop being hetrosexual? or is only homosexuals that need to avoid getting std's?[/b]

logical fallacy and irrelevancy, we are not talking of heterosexuals, but of homosexual behavior and its consequences, why instead of citing Africa which has a disproportionate amount of HIV suffers to the rest of the world, dont you cite studies of homosexuals and heterosexuals say in the UK, oh that is correct, because it shows your ludicrous argument up for what it is, here is a fact for you, HIV is at its highest among gays in the UK, ever. No reference to Africa, no reference to heterosexuals in Africa negates this fact, now suck it up and stop being a slap head.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
why is he so angry? where does this anger come from?

Perhaps because you have sanctioned a practice which is essentially hurtful and ultimately preventable, just think if all those gays hadn't put their willies where they were not supposed to be they might not have gotten HIV, dont you think?

Originally posted by sonhouse
Well, you finally gave us a look at your own self outside the biblical bullshyte. Your words speak for themselves.

Actually the Bible states that its unnatural but a reprobate like you would not know that, because you first would have to read it and second know what you were talking about. Words speak for themselves, isn't that what they are supposed to do, gee, are you in your senses this day? skipped some meds?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
or political fashion victims like you and these other materialists.

A 'political fashion victim'?! That's a new one me.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
A 'political fashion victim'?! That's a new one me.

Yes i made it up today, appropriate dont you think for all these that have jumped on the gay parade bandwagon.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Gods wrath!

How does a spirit become angry?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
logical fallacy and irrelevancy, we are not talking of heterosexuals, but of homosexual behavior and its consequences, why instead of citing Africa which has a disproportionate amount of HIV suffers to the rest of the world, dont you cite studies of homosexuals and heterosexuals say in the UK, oh that is correct, because it shows your ludicrous argum ...[text shortened]... ference to heterosexuals in Africa negates this fact, now suck it up and stop being a slap head.

as ive pointed out to you before (and you choose to ignore) male h.i.v. sufferers in the u.k. have the same life span as any other male. infact a male h.i.v. sufferer in the u.k. has a higher life span than the average scottish male.

my concern with h.i.v. is the parts of the world where it is killing people by the millions, which happens to be africa. you may wish to dismiss this as irrelevant, but why you would want to only focus on british statistics is rather bizarre and i can only imagine its because the statistics there back up your warped sense of logic.

if you wish to focus on only british statistics does this mean you only want british people to stop being homosexual?