Origin :) the numbers

@kellyjay said
If you didn't read what I already said about that, it is meaningless to repeat myself.

I asked you how can you possibly believe that you being spectacularly wrong "doesn’t change anything"? But you didn't address it. Are you allowed to be spectacularly wrong? Yes, you are. But how can you possibly think it "doesn’t change anything" in a conversation if you are?

@kellyjay said
LOL

It is after all why you are bringing it up on a Spirituality Forum and not a Science Forum. It's because you want to promote your superstitions.

@fmf said
It is after all why you are bringing it up on a Spirituality Forum and not a Science Forum. It's because you want to promote your superstitions.

Copy it over there I don't care.

@kellyjay said
It doesn't alter the fundamental points of contention one way or another with what I have been saying.

But don't you believe that the Earth being 6,000 years old corroborates ancient Hebrew mythology and that ancient Hebrew mythology corroborates the Earth being 6,000 years old? Why else would you profess belief in such a thing? It certainly isn't because you are interested in science.

@fmf said
I asked you how can you possibly believe that you being spectacularly wrong "doesn’t change anything"? But you didn't address it. Are you allowed to be spectacularly wrong? Yes, you are. But how can you possibly think it "doesn’t change anything" in a conversation if you are?

Yes I did answer it, just like when I answered your other question you simply didn't bother reading what I wrote, or only looked at snips of it. If you want to know the answers to those things you ask I suggest you read them.

@kellyjay said
Copy it over there I don't care.

I know full well that you don't care. And I know why you don't care.

@fmf said
But don't you believe that the Earth being 6,000 years old corroborates ancient Hebrew mythology and that ancient Hebrew mythology corroborates the Earth being 6,000 years old? Why else would you profess belief in such a thing? It certainly isn't because you are interested in science.

If you want to discuss Hebrew mythology start a thread. This is about the numbers of origin.

@kellyjay said
Yes I did answer it, just like when I answered your other question you simply didn't bother reading what I wrote, or only looked at snips of it. If you want to know the answers to those things you ask I suggest you read them.

How can you possibly think it "doesn’t change anything" in a conversation about something like the age of the Earth if you are spectacularly wrong?

@fmf said
How can you possibly think it "doesn’t change anything" in a conversation about something like the age of the Earth if you are spectacularly wrong?

Go back and read where that was addressed.

@fmf said
I know full well that you don't care. And I know why you don't care.

You should use your mind reading abilities to answer all the questions you have.

@kellyjay said
If you want to discuss Hebrew mythology start a thread. This is about the numbers of origin.

Your belief that the Earth is only 6,000 years old and your bias towards the video clip in the OP is about corroborating ancient Hebrew mythology and absolutely nothing else whatsoever.

@kellyjay said
Go back and read where that was addressed.

Being "spectacularly wrong", as you put it, changes everything. Your contention that it "doesn’t change anything" is nonsense.

@fmf said
Your belief that the Earth is only 6,000 years old and your bias towards the video clip in the OP is about corroborating ancient Hebrew mythology and absolutely nothing else whatsoever.

Next time I get an idea, would you mind posting for me before I say anything, it will save us both a lot of time.

@kellyjay said
Next time I get an idea, would you mind posting for me before I say anything, it will save us both a lot of time.

There is nothing controversial about what I said.

@fmf said
There is nothing controversial about what I said.

Is that a yes, you will read my mind know what I want and why I'm doing it and post it for me?