11 Feb '19 13:58>
@kellyjay saidHow are those observations "insulting"? I haven't called you a "gutless puke" or a "nasty liar" or a "slithering coward" or anything like that.
So insulting without anything of substance, typical.
@kellyjay saidHow are those observations "insulting"? I haven't called you a "gutless puke" or a "nasty liar" or a "slithering coward" or anything like that.
So insulting without anything of substance, typical.
@fmf saidTouche, when the discussion goes personal the topic is not being discussed. I could go back and read more things you have said, but I think it isn’t necessary.
How are those observations "insulting"? I haven't called you a "gutless puke" or a "nasty liar" or a "slithering coward" or anything like that.
@kellyjay saidCan you provide links to the peer review publications that support the claims made in this 'documentary'..please.
[youtube] W1_KEVaCyaA [/youtube]
@stellspalfie saidYou can search for them if you want to.
Can you provide links to the peer review publications that support the claims made in this 'documentary'..please.
@stellspalfie saidThere something wrong with the argument you want to highlight, or just highlight peer view papers on a video were or were not written? I would care about the first not so much the latter.
have you read them?
@kellyjay saidWell that's your big issue. You should care more about the latter. Its the actual science that counts not how persuasive the argument is.
There something wrong with the argument you want to highlight, or just highlight peer view papers on a video were or were not written? I would care about the first not so much the latter.
@kellyjay saidGot another quick question for you - What is it about ice core and tree ring data that makes you think its an unreliable source for climate change modelling?
There something wrong with the argument you want to highlight, or just highlight peer view papers on a video were or were not written? I would care about the first not so much the latter.
@stellspalfie saidDo you automatically accept peer review papers?
Well that's your big issue. You should care more about the latter. Its the actual science that counts not how persuasive the argument is.
So, have you checked to see if the science behind the claims made in the video is solid? Or do you just accept it.
@kellyjay saidNo, that would be silly. It certainly goes a long way towards making me take the idea or claim seriously though.
Do you automatically accept peer review papers?
@stellspalfie saidGreat question, if neither can be totally trusted don’t you think argument not where it is and isn’t shown should stand on its own?
No, that would be silly. It certainly goes a long way towards making me take the idea or claim seriously though.
How do you discern which youtube videos are pseudoscience and which are real science?
@kellyjay saidWhich would you choose to diagnose your illness a Doctor or a Hollywood actor who plays a Doctor? Neither can be 100% trusted but one should be taken a lot more seriously than the other.
Great question, if neither can be totally trusted don’t you think argument not where it is and isn’t shown should stand on its own?
@stellspalfie saidIt’s not a good comparison since the letters behind the names involved are all impressive on both sides of the discussion. You can look at the reasoning being deployed, validate the variables, and check out the methodology. You find something off highlight it.
Which would you choose to diagnose your illness a Doctor or a Hollywood actor who plays a Doctor? Neither can be 100% trusted but one should be taken a lot more seriously than the other.
So although a peer reviewed theory may draw incorrect conclusions it should be take seriously and despite being incorrect conclusions, will still contain useful data and science.
...[text shortened]... ce to substantiate the claims can be found.
You never answered my question about trees and ice.
@kellyjay said"Touche"?
Touche, when the discussion goes personal the topic is not being discussed. I could go back and read more things you have said, but I think it isn’t necessary.