Originally posted by EcstremeVenom
there is a difference between this and what dr. scribbles said, dr. scribbles says the die can be either a 3 or not a 3, but there is 5 other possiblities. with this one, there is two possibilities, his theory is flawed. God can not half-exist, he either does or he doesnt. since there is only two possibilities, it should be compared to a coin, not a die. when you flip a coin it is either heads or tails and has a 50% chance to land on heads.
I believe a 3 will be rolled. It either will, or it will not. But it is clearly not a 50/50 chance. It doesn't make any difference how may variables there are in 'not 3.'
Let's look at a few others. I say you will die from a heart attack within 2 hours. Either you will, or you won't. Does it therefore stand that there is a 50/50 chance that you will die from a heart attack within 2 hours? Clearly not. Even though it's an either/or proposition, the odds of you having a heart attack in that timeframe are very small. Certainly less than 1%.
I say that if you buy a lottery ticket that you will win. Either you will win, or you won't. Do you think there's a 50/50 chance that you will win? Because there are two possible outcomes, it does not follow that each outcome has an equal probability.
I hope you can see where this is going.
Plus you are leaving your particular god as the only option. Let's add a Viking into the equation. You say a christian god exists. The Viking says Thor exists. And I say that no gods exist. Do we now each have a 33.3% chance of being right? If the Viking says that both Thor and Odin exist, do all of our chances drop to 25%?