Go back
Question to any JW

Question to any JW

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
dude its a time waster, moving quickly on . . . .
... and the quicker the better?

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
... and the quicker the better?
one cannot stop to kick every little dog that barks at us! and may i remind you,
seeing that i have taken an interest in your continuing Bible education, that a
workman of the Lord does not need to fight, indeed we are counselled as true
christians to avoid it,

(2 Timothy 2:14-15) . . .Keep reminding them of these things, charging them before
God as witness, not to fight about words, a thing of no usefulness at all because it
overturns those listening. Do your utmost to present yourself approved to God, a
workman with nothing to be ashamed of, handling the word of the truth aright. . .

(2 Timothy 2:24) . . .But a slave of the Lord does not need to fight. . .

its ok, no need to thank me, its been a pleasure, all yours.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

From all past discussions with you up to this point you are only asking to ridicule and berate. So why is this time any different? Do you think we're fools?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
i have given these scriptural references, its enough, we dont need to debate anything,
we have our beliefs, we are very happy with them, if you are really interested, go to

www.watchtower.org

if you have any specific Biblical texts that you would like to discuss, then feel free, but
as you have continually attacked our beliefs i see no point in continuing the same
pattern, again and again and again. Unless you produce a Biblical reference i am not
interested, for you continually ignore any biblical reference that we give.

4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
what you think about us, our beliefs , our organisation, our Bible teaching program, our
elders, our ministry, the way the organisation is financed, our motives, our
personalities, our Bible translation, our stance on medical procedures, is irrelevant, i
repeat, irrelevant to anyone but you.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i have given these scriptural references, its enough, we dont need to debate anything,
we have our beliefs, we are very happy with them, if you are really interested, go to

www.watchtower.org

if you have any specific Biblical texts that you would like to discuss, then feel free, but
as you have continually attacked our beliefs i see no poin ...[text shortened]... reference i am not
interested, for you continually ignore any biblical reference that we give.
Oh, those are biblical references? I thought they were from the NWT.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
But you are only wanting a yes or no answer, is that fair?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Oh, those are biblical references? I thought they were from the NWT.
they are, the most accurate Biblical translation known to the English speaking world!
As associate professor Jason David BeDuhn reminds us, who just happens to have
reviewed nine of the most common English translations in his rather wonderful book,
Truth In Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New
Testament. by Jason David BeDuhn,

have you not read it, then how would you know what an accurate translation is. Do
tell or will you scurry away again when pressed on this matter?

A 2003 study by Jason BeDuhn, associate professor of religious studies at Northern
Arizona University in the United States, of nine of "the Bibles most widely in use in
the English-speaking world," including the New American Bible, The King James Bible
and The New International Version, examined several New Testament passages in
which "bias is most likely to interfere with translation." For each passage, he
compared the Greek text with the renderings of each English translation, and looked
for biased attempts to change the meaning. BeDuhn reported that the New World
Translation was "not bias free", but emerged "as the most accurate of the
translations compared
", and thus a "remarkably good translation", adding that
"most of the differences are due to the greater accuracy of the NW as a literal,
conservative translation".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Translation_of_the_Holy_Scriptures

now what have you got to say for yourself, jaw on floor?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
If it's still a yes or no you want, I will not answer.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
if you have a scriptural reference i will answer that, if you dont, i am uninterested, try,
the salvation army.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Also stop questioning my motives. You don't know me at all and what is in my heart. Stop questioning who I am as you are no judge of anyone!!!!!!!!