- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @rajk999<<They have the light of Christ in them.
How do people go good works?
They have the light of Christ in them.
All people have this light in them
Do you have a Bible?
Please read it.
All people have this light in them.>>
So even people who reject Christ have this light in them? Where in the Bible does it say that?
And not everyone will be saved. So, according to what you wrote, some people who have the light of Christ in them (because everyone does, according to you) will be damned.
There you go again, diminishing Jesus Christ. Are you aware that this is a consistent theme in what you believe?
You don’t think accepting Christ makes someone righteous (in right standing with God.)
You reject Christ’s sacrifice on the cross by saying no one can sin and go to heaven or inherit eternal life.
You now strongly imply people who will be damned (because they didn’t do enough good works in your eyes) have the light of Christ in them.
Not to be blunt, but you’re a Christ hater (or a Christ blasphemer if you prefer.)
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Ok so you think Rajk999 is one. You said there were several "haters" (i.e. people you have theological disagreements with). Who are the others?
Not to be blunt, but you’re a Christ hater (or a Christ blasphemer if you prefer.)
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfShould I play your game and say I already answered that?
Ok so you think Rajk999 is one. You said there were several "haters" (i.e. people you have theological disagreements with). Who are the others?
Why is it important for you to know?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfI note that you blew a gasket when I excerpted one of your posts in a reply (instead of posting the whole thing) and yet you do that consistently with me.
Ok so you think Rajk999 is one. You said there were several "haters" (i.e. people you have theological disagreements with). Who are the others?
Not that I care; I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
And I never said there were “haters” in here. I said there were “God haters.” There is a distinction. Apparently you are so much of an atheist, you can’t even write the word “God.”
And my view that there are “God haters” in here isn’t based on “theological disagreements.” It’s based on blasphemy.
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009I called you out for deleting 20 words from a 23 word sentence.
I note that you blew a gasket when I excerpted one of your posts in a reply (instead of posting the whole thing) and yet you do that consistently with me.
14 Feb 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009Ok, so you think Rajk999 is one. Who are the others?
Should I play your game and say I already answered that?
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Your accusation of "blasphemy" is a theological stance is it not?
And my view that there are “God haters” in here isn’t based on “theological disagreements.” It’s based on blasphemy.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfI never said anybody ate the others. Where’d you get that?
Ok, so you think Rajk999 is one. Who ate the others?
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009It's a typo. The world is "hate".
I never said anybody ate the others. Where’d you get that?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfOh good grief. So I’m hopping on this merry-go-round again...
I called you out for deleting 20 words from a 23 word sentence.
The post I excerpted appeared in its entirety directly above the excerpt, and the only part of your post I felt the need to reply to was the three words I excerpted.
But let’s argue about this for the next 20 years. Goodness knows the fate of the world hangs in the balance.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfNot really.
Your accusation of "blasphemy" is a theological stance is it not?
In fact, not at all.
14 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Can you explain how an accusation of "blasphemy" can somehow be made without it being a theological stance?
Not really.
In fact, not at all.
14 Feb 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009You are lying. Top of page 4 on Thread 175846.
The post I excerpted appeared in its entirety directly above the excerpt, and the only part of your post I felt the need to reply to was the three words I excerpted.