14 Feb '18 06:48>
Originally posted by @romans1009You're right. So, you think Rajk999 is one of the "God haters". Who are the others?
Wrong. The word was “are.”
Originally posted by @romans1009You're right. So, you think Rajk999 is one of the "God haters". Who are the others?
Wrong. The word was “are.”
Originally posted by @rajk999Serious question, are you are RLA?
An atheist is one who professes no belief or faith. A Red-Letter Atheist [RLA] is one who understands the teachings of Christ and who in their daily lives put into practice many of these principles.
A Christian is one who professes belief / faith in God. A Black Letter Christian [BLC] is one who does not acknowledge the teachings of Christ claiming that ...[text shortened]... le with Christ. No argument there.
Who will fare better on judgment day? The RLAs of BLCs ?
Originally posted by @fmfIt was the post immediately preceding. I had forgotten that the excerpted post started on a new page. Can you ever forgive me?
You are lying. Top of page 4 on Thread 175846.
Originally posted by @romans1009And your calling me a “liar” because of that is itself a lie because I was simply and only mistaken. “Lying” requires intentional deception, something you have more than a passing acquaintance with.
It was the post immediately preceding. I had forgotten that the excerpted post started on a new page. Can you ever forgive me?
Originally posted by @romans1009The reason you were called out for doctoring the sentence you were quoting is found in the subsequent posts on that thread. Clearly what you did was deliberate. If you had not deleted words from the sentence you were supposedly replying to, it would have made you look even more foolish.
And your calling me a “liar” because of that is itself a lie because I was simply and only mistaken. “Lying” requires intentional deception, something you have more than a passing acquaintance with.
Originally posted by @fmfWhatever. I was, to use your vernacular, just “calling it as I saw it.”
The reason you were called out for doctoring the sentence you were quoting is found in the subsequent posts on that thread. Clearly what you did was deliberate. If you had not deleted words from the sentence you were supposedly replying to, it would have made you look even more foolish.
Originally posted by @romans1009[ Jesus] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
<<They have the light of Christ in them.
All people have this light in them.>>
So even people who reject Christ have this light in them? Where in the Bible does it say that?
And not everyone will be saved. So, according to what you wrote, some people who have the light of Christ in them (because everyone does, according to you) will be damned.
...[text shortened]... t in them.
Not to be blunt, but you’re a Christ hater (or a Christ blasphemer if you prefer.)
Originally posted by @rajk999<<b][i][ Jesus] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.>>
[ Jesus] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
(John 1:9 KJV)
Not everyone that has the light of Christ will enter the Kingdom of God.
But all those who follow his commandments will.
Originally posted by @romans1009For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
<<b][i][ Jesus] was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.>>
That’s a tortured and incorrect interpretation, imo. How is lighting every man the same as indwelling every man or the same as man possessing the light?
<<Not everyone that has the light of Christ will enter the Kingdom of God.>>
Everyone that has God’s Ho ...[text shortened]... ieves in Jesus Christ in their heart (a strong, sincere, committed and self-sacrificing belief.)
Originally posted by @rajk999Check out this answer and I’ll offer my own thoughts in a separate post:
[i]For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open ...[text shortened]... t fall away.
Fall away means going astray = doing evil and sin = not following the commandments
Originally posted by @romans1009Cut and paste rubuttal of Paul? Wont waste time reading that.
Check out this answer and I’ll offer my own thoughts in a separate post:
Question: "Does Hebrews 6:4-6 mean we can lose our salvation?"
Answer: Hebrews 6:4-6 states, “For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the good word of God and the ...[text shortened]... lippians 1:6; 1 Peter 1:4-5), and Hebrews 6:4-6 confirms that doctrine.
From gotquestions.org
Originally posted by @rajk999I already addressed Annanias and Sapphira. You don’t remember? Yes, God killed them for lying to the Holy Spirit as an example to early Christians, but where in the Bible does it say they lost their salvation?
Cut and paste rubuttal of Paul? Wont waste time reading that.
Here is another for you to find and cut and past rebuttal:
[i]If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Know ye not that ye are the temple ...[text shortened]... E DESTROYED... like Annanias and Sapphira.
Lets see a cut and paste rebuttal of this one.[/b]
Originally posted by @rajk999Does destroyed mean lose their salvation? And what, in your view, qualifies as “defiling?” If you think it’s sinning, then God would have destroyed everyone because everyone - even you! - sins.
Cut and paste rubuttal of Paul? Wont waste time reading that.
Here is another for you to find and cut and past rebuttal:
[i]If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Know ye not that ye are the temple ...[text shortened]... E DESTROYED... like Annanias and Sapphira.
Lets see a cut and paste rebuttal of this one.[/b]
Originally posted by @rajk999No need for a copy-and-paste rebuttal on this one; this one was easy.
Cut and paste rubuttal of Paul? Wont waste time reading that.
Here is another for you to find and cut and past rebuttal:
[i]If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
Know ye not that ye are the temple ...[text shortened]... E DESTROYED... like Annanias and Sapphira.
Lets see a cut and paste rebuttal of this one.[/b]