12 Nov '11 23:49>2 edits
Originally posted by AgergHow about conscientious atheist?
Your definition does nothing to set me apart from someone who has given the matter no thought whatsoever, it lacks any nuance or qualifiers other than a lack of belief; for that reason I can rightfully say that a zebra is also an atheist (you may not like this, but if you're set upon such an inclusive definition of the word then I can play the same game)
As poor clarification on my part since I don't affirm that no possible god or gods can exist.
You want atheism to be a badge of honour, I think it's just a label.
Because I want to be special and only associated with the cool people is not a good reason to justify the definition
of atheism to something that makes you look cooler.
Many theists haven't given their belief in god any real though either, this doesn't mean they are not theists.
It doesn't mean a zebra because it only applies to things that can answer the question "do you believe in god".
And why should the label need any qualifiers? are you claiming yourself to be better than someone who doesn't
believe in god who hasn't thought about it as much as you have?
What level of thought would qualify you to be considered an atheist by your standards?
Theism/theist means someone who believes in a god or gods.
What the hell is wrong with atheism simply meaning the negative, someone who doesn't believe in a god or gods?